Both the "replicated-failback-static" and "replicated-failback" examples run without issue out of the box on my machine so I'm not sure what's going on with that. One thing that's odd is that out-of-the-box the line 122 [1] doesn't match the method call in your NPE. Perhaps you modified the example?
Aside from that there were a handful of questions in my previous message you didn't address. I think the questions about thread dumps are the most pressing given that you indicated you're deleting the pod. My guess is that the client is getting hung in a network call that doesn't want to return due to the pod disappearing. A series of thread dumps during the minute delay would confirm or deny that. Justin [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/2.31.2/examples/features/ha/replicated-failback-static/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/example/ReplicatedFailbackStaticExample.java#L122 On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 12:47 PM Lino Pereira <lino.pere...@redpointglobal.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey Justing, thanks for the help. > > > > We are using version 2.31.2, which is pretty recent, if not the latest. > > > > With regards to the log traces, other AMQ threads show similar behavior, > and our system isn’t doing much until AMQ-client stabilizes. > > I am running on a k3d cluster and the failover is triggered by me deleting > the dm-activemq-live pod, which k8s then spins back up. > > Also, our slave config does NOT specify “allow-failback=true”, so the spin > up of the new dm-activemq-live instance does not trigger a fail-back, which > is intentional to eliminate failover-failback chaos in such a short time. > > > > I am trying to setup a simpler test case by using one of the examples, > artemis/2.31.2/examples/features/ha/replicated-failback-static, however, I > am getting this NPE on line 112: > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke > "javax.jms.TextMessage.getText()" because "message0" is null > > > > The NPE seems to indicate that, you cannot call consumer.receive() again > even if NOT acknowledged, which seems to contradict the comments on the > code. I have run into this same behavior in another example as well, > artemis/2.31.2/examples/features/ha/replicated-failback. > > > > Can you please confirm the expected behavior of the example code in the > 2.31.2 version? I can then modify the code accordingly. Or please point me > to a working sample code. > > > > Thanks, > > Lino > > > > > > > [image: rg] <https://www.redpointglobal.com/> > > Lino Pereira > > C++ Developer, Redpoint Global Inc. > > 34 Washington Street, Suite 205 Wellesley Hills, MA 02481 > > lino.pere...@redpointglobal.com > > *From:* Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > *Sent:* Monday, January 8, 2024 9:20 PM > *To:* users@activemq.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Looking for HA/replication boilerplate broker.xml and > advice (continued) > > > > **** [Caution] This email is from an external source. Please use caution > responding, opening attachments or clicking embedded links. **** > > > > > Now, the backup process does start processing msgs right away... > > > > What evidence do you have of that? > > > > > ...the ActiveMQ-client needs 2 “Trying reconnection attempts”, 1-minute > apart, before it stabilizes after the failover and is once again usable. > > > > The log snippets you provided show a reconnection attempt back to > dm-activemq-live-svc:61616 (i.e. the broker which failed) and then to > dm-activemq-backup-svc:61617 both of which fail almost immediately. Then > right after that another connection attempt is made to > dm-activemq-live-svc:61616 which appears to take a minute to fail (i.e. > from 20:03:44.874 to 20:04:44.933). Are there any other logs during this > minute? Did you happen to get any thread dumps during this time? If so, > what did they show? If not, could you? What was happening with > dm-activemq-live-svc during this time? Perhaps there was something weird > going on with the network related to whatever you were doing with that > machine to trigger failover. > > > > You might consider simplifying your test-case and then adding complexity > bit by bit to see what triggers the difference in behavior. For example, > run your test with the client and both brokers on the *same machine*. If > that works then move just the client to a remote machine. If that works > then test the client just reconnecting to the primary broker upon restart > (i.e. no failover). Then finally put all three entities on separate > machines and test failover. Hopefully such an exercise will give you a > better understanding of where the problem might lie. > > > > Lastly, please indicate what version of ActiveMQ Artemis you're using. > > > > > > Justin > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:43 PM Lino Pereira < > lino.pere...@redpointglobal.com.invalid> wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > I’m working with John Lilley on getting an ActiveMQ HA configuration > operational. Our current HA config is replication with master and slave > instances and with static connections, and it seems to be working, except > that the ActiveMQ-client is taking over 1 minute to reconfigure/reconnect > itself after a failover from the live to the backup instance. Now, the > backup process does start processing msgs right away, but the > ActiveMQ-client needs 2 “Trying reconnection attempts”, 1-minute apart, > before it stabilizes after the failover and is once again usable. I have > included the relevant log traces from the Thread-0 ActiveMQ-client showing > the Connection failure detection all the way through when the client is > usable again, over 1 minute later. I am hoping that, based on the trace, > you can find something that, perhaps, we should be doing differently in the > client side? > > > > Here is our Client connection url: > > (tcp://dm-activemq-live-svc: > 61616,tcp://dm-activemq-backup-svc:61617)?ha=true&reconnectAttempts=100&initialConnectAttempts=100 > > > > Should we also be including the corresponding connector names? > > > > In an earlier email with John Lilley you recommended 2 brokers using > “shared storage” instead of “replication”, which I will try next, however, > since this issue seems to be on the client-side, I want to make sure our > client-side is setup correctly. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > Lino > > > > Thread-0 log traces: > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.852 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > client.connectionFailureDetected:293 [] WARN - AMQ212037: Connection > failure to dm-activemq-live-svc/10.43.197.248:61616 has been detected: > AMQ219015: The connection was disconnected because of server shutdown > [code=DISCONNECTED] > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.852 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.failoverOrReconnect:587 [] DEBUG - Failure > captured on connectionID=a8a4a77c, performing failover or reconnection now > ActiveMQDisconnectedException[errorType=DISCONNECTED message=AMQ219015: The > connection was disconnected because of server shutdown] > > --- > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.857 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.getConnectionWithRetry:956 [] DEBUG - Trying > reconnection attempt 0/200 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.857 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.createTransportConnection:1328 [] DEBUG - Trying > to connect with > connectorFactory=org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.NettyConnectorFactory@68dd9fb0 > and currentConnectorConfig: TransportConfiguration(name=null, > factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) > ?port=61616&host=dm-activemq-live-svc&reconnectAttempts=200&ha=true&initialConnectAttempts=200 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.857 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:553 [] DEBUG - Connector NettyConnector > [host=dm-activemq-live-svc, port=61616, httpEnabled=false, > httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > using nio > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.857 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:772 [] DEBUG - Started NIO Netty Connector version > 4.1.101.Final to dm-activemq-live-svc:61616 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.857 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.createConnection:877 [] DEBUG - Remote destination: > dm-activemq-live-svc/10.43.197.248:61616 > > > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.864 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.openTransportConnection:1215 [] DEBUG - Connector > towards NettyConnector [host=dm-activemq-live-svc, port=61616, > httpEnabled=false, httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > failed > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.866 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.createTransportConnection:1328 [] DEBUG - Trying > to connect with > connectorFactory=org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.NettyConnectorFactory@68dd9fb0 > and backupConnectorConfig: TransportConfiguration(name=netty-connector, > factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) > ?port=61617&host=dm-activemq-backup-svc > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.866 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:553 [] DEBUG - Connector NettyConnector > [host=dm-activemq-backup-svc, port=61617, httpEnabled=false, > httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > using nio > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.866 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:772 [] DEBUG - Started NIO Netty Connector version > 4.1.101.Final to dm-activemq-backup-svc:61617 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.866 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.createConnection:877 [] DEBUG - Remote destination: > dm-activemq-backup-svc/10.43.11.76:61617 > > > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.872 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.openTransportConnection:1215 [] DEBUG - Connector > towards NettyConnector [host=dm-activemq-backup-svc, port=61617, > httpEnabled=false, httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > failed > > 2024-01-08T20:03:43.873 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.createTransportConnection:1297 [] DEBUG - no > connection been made, returning null > > --- > > 2024-01-08T20:03:44.873 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.getConnectionWithRetry:956 [] DEBUG - Trying > reconnection attempt 1/200 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:44.873 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.createTransportConnection:1328 [] DEBUG - Trying > to connect with > connectorFactory=org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.NettyConnectorFactory@68dd9fb0 > and currentConnectorConfig: TransportConfiguration(name=null, > factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) > ?port=61616&host=dm-activemq-live-svc&reconnectAttempts=200&ha=true&initialConnectAttempts=200 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:44.873 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:553 [] DEBUG - Connector NettyConnector > [host=dm-activemq-live-svc, port=61616, httpEnabled=false, > httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > using nio > > 2024-01-08T20:03:44.873 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:772 [] DEBUG - Started NIO Netty Connector version > 4.1.101.Final to dm-activemq-live-svc:61616 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:44.873 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.createConnection:877 [] DEBUG - Remote destination: > dm-activemq-live-svc/10.43.197.248:61616 > > 2024-01-08T20:03:44.874 [Thread-8 (ActiveMQ-client-netty-threads)] > NettyConnector.initChannel:762 [] DEBUG - Added > ActiveMQClientChannelHandler to Channel with id = ced14fbc > > > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.933 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.openTransportConnection:1215 [] DEBUG - Connector > towards NettyConnector [host=dm-activemq-live-svc, port=61616, > httpEnabled=false, httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > failed > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.933 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.createTransportConnection:1328 [] DEBUG - Trying > to connect with > connectorFactory=org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.NettyConnectorFactory@68dd9fb0 > and backupConnectorConfig: TransportConfiguration(name=netty-connector, > factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) > ?port=61617&host=dm-activemq-backup-svc > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.933 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:553 [] DEBUG - Connector NettyConnector > [host=dm-activemq-backup-svc, port=61617, httpEnabled=false, > httpUpgradeEnabled=false, useServlet=false, > servletPath=/messaging/ActiveMQServlet, sslEnabled=false, useNio=true] > using nio > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.933 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.start:772 [] DEBUG - Started NIO Netty Connector version > 4.1.101.Final to dm-activemq-backup-svc:61617 > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.933 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > NettyConnector.createConnection:877 [] DEBUG - Remote destination: > dm-activemq-backup-svc/10.43.11.76:61617 > > > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.936 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.createTransportConnection:1336 [] DEBUG - > Connected with the > backupConnectorConfig=TransportConfiguration(name=netty-connector, > factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-core-remoting-impl-netty-NettyConnectorFactory) > ?port=61617&host=dm-activemq-backup-svc > > > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.966 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.getConnectionWithRetry:964 [] DEBUG - Reconnection > successful > > 2024-01-08T20:04:44.969 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ActiveMQSessionContext.reattachOnNewConnection:888 [] DEBUG - Couldn't > reattach session 11, performing as a failover operation now and recreating > objects > > 2024-01-08T20:04:45.002 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ActiveMQSessionContext.reattachOnNewConnection:888 [] DEBUG - Couldn't > reattach session 10, performing as a failover operation now and recreating > objects > > > > 2024-01-08T20:04:45.019 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > AbstractProducerCreditsImpl.reset:123 [] DEBUG - reset credits on address > activemq.management > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2factivemq.management&c=E,1,hqiYs6vnJzfq-X42G9W9ohJtYgn9LRPR-82RHxMyPnKUD5xBwCbo8W6b-PegfmAGwvEENlDO0k2IkoGFFegGxR-H6J72UHHlpEFbGtJzhCF3sucQ&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > > 2024-01-08T20:04:45.019 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > AbstractProducerCreditsImpl.checkCredits:178 [] DEBUG - Requesting 65536 > credits on address activemq.management > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2factivemq.management&c=E,1,KX9atZvl9XxpGPWobW9hXsmaLrVekfw2221zvD0PJ9Ik3fEQVyHKcZZCe7MQRciamxD-T-WDEk5Xa7_cAt0PSHwVW3jG7zzhq8XH9XIRC8EXmg,,&typo=1&ancr_add=1>, > needed = 65536, arriving = 0 > > 2024-01-08T20:04:45.019 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > AbstractProducerCreditsImpl.requestCredits:187 [] DEBUG - Request 65536 > credits on address activemq.management > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2factivemq.management&c=E,1,ZOCwWoQv34cYLuw9hZvJzBHfSrX6oQeQ_3-SetFMJa1hRC6lXgiKsAElOhfZ_vfnBhRGRJPZjSOqHIbwWO2ltSYYY7ElQjyItp0uDo79_jaDkw,,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > > 2024-01-08T20:04:45.020 [Thread-0 (ActiveMQ-client-global-threads)] > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.failoverOrReconnect:587 [] DEBUG - Failure > captured on connectionID=a8a4a77c, performing failover or reconnection now > ActiveMQNotConnectedException[errorType=NOT_CONNECTED message=AMQ219006: > Channel disconnected] > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientSessionFactoryImpl.connectionDestroyed( > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.java:410 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fClientSessionFactoryImpl.java%3a410&c=E,1,obbNTaFqn6mglgyZXy1S-0nBLNVtEYlkZBwAEKSGDGN0RuqlR_-7fIQPW4ELNqVFJdenAcKh65C3yQ2b_Lef7W01Tst6ZTrmI66KfHLae572jXv-HF3O&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.NettyConnector.close( > NettyConnector.java:835 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fNettyConnector.java%3a835&c=E,1,ytVVTXzfq-J1NXl2ct7T_47F5EbfZNQTXP8dlqw720EiCe32c6CLwlpk0-v4MzUD61FErq0nkRTalFpcTtIN8TDeBvz70rzb__TyeIDm48ZKfFU28qQ,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientSessionFactoryImpl.failoverOrReconnect( > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.java:666 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fClientSessionFactoryImpl.java%3a666&c=E,1,KQYUuEgOaR6V8a_ZC_xBpKZmDneB4LTL1cQzn2Gqtla8ntHJ1fgRs9KelLgvbMd9zvBTg8maXUerYZYQZa-DlfK7fon0JZ0O74PNJ1SOCHqIPN4fZQ6Xv731OGOD&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientSessionFactoryImpl.handleConnectionFailure( > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.java:566 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fClientSessionFactoryImpl.java%3a566&c=E,1,OSVh6NSORxz7qZ6eIuUDgWskoYfyXT4NNdjJYGMbH7HeWEUiymys2DnptjYKdmQfqjfHmI-egRZ31yWwd9MKzEd-gbbsuTUsqn_46niKaw,,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientSessionFactoryImpl$DelegatingFailureListener.connectionFailed( > ClientSessionFactoryImpl.java:1407 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fClientSessionFactoryImpl.java%3a1407&c=E,1,DM2boEBGg44zzcd0m37ITkOnfDrkqLE8ZSFGJpEI4AGo2GyOI2yKX08AEkKHxw_UnDMF1vccYEvESFDXjXBBjjIGO5TEsMLWZHbJF3AOIEQ73uc,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.protocol.AbstractRemotingConnection.callFailureListeners( > AbstractRemotingConnection.java:98 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fAbstractRemotingConnection.java%3a98&c=E,1,wipgGeA7UVZIy1uuqvuxJEx4BA8TvYfSYmO617IgrvnOo-z7sn1vUjXFqIEU9M1HmedBVoHxB_LpvuEZ9p_biioPM8V-V9eS8i8oST46GvBhZZIc&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.impl.RemotingConnectionImpl.fail > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2forg.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.impl.RemotingConnectionImpl.fail&c=E,1,0FNTjscT_d2CNIid0J8d_x7C7Peb6_neE-a_MZeKqkM1o_sPGujvpkXuiLv6kms9wSFyYqSux86C1MX2R8WKM8IZBsjKt7sCs03U2lRYlVbw2eTDg0ihSEV1nA,,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > (RemotingConnectionImpl.java:212 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fRemotingConnectionImpl.java%3a212&c=E,1,3yKPqxpIi9n43QJSCQiysKGlEYttZ5Dmuirc7jUAWNz6orLfIUCYwdDEJ3eU0QiHywsNAJdWqrvnx5rZK6-8TTJb6o8tr1WSvSL7omLF&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientSessionFactoryImpl$ > CloseRunnable.run > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fCloseRunnable.run&c=E,1,6B4qLrj7q9DzDb0Trp9xgst7cOBhbD4hcEcGyPFul5E_mh3_oGmColB9YQkQTB1gJ6x5Mcm0VwvBLddpDpfFkcZwlzb4YNR9Ym5fcDclFW97pIrQ9oG4&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > (ClientSessionFactoryImpl.java:1172 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fClientSessionFactoryImpl.java%3a1172&c=E,1,KqR93A_gEw1FpU7__PsYjSkOC5LH0zFTSKu5K9YlCdVAz3h_c9EkBndO7aliE4RSbK_qslEZp0b-YzJfCOxmB22jAfplsYxguMl1qjC0rWpNjfr9_fh4RjNL3AOK&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask( > OrderedExecutor.java:57 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fOrderedExecutor.java%3a57&c=E,1,mhChlKkihYjDw_Kk5SL1d_4eb7zhBlSzri_nwjOUsrs6MAvEfDAAjia07yTMUU6CQqc0WbDS2Fn8HJJI0UwJh1N7SKiz9dsP1gJLmgY66huLhXZE9c-3ECGXyIWQ&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.doTask( > OrderedExecutor.java:32 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fOrderedExecutor.java%3a32&c=E,1,nn8IDmg6XQJLLXzH7kunXDNZa_3A7fUlnHdRCLoha7gQWJO1QeY32duGFAQMYaFHsfIbHbv142mei8HfCqRwrpuUfikYxLkFoXaD3pORZb9roBJs0H8,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase.executePendingTasks( > ProcessorBase.java:68 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fProcessorBase.java%3a68&c=E,1,DPLEvt-MPmmzv78LEkeXtYHM2q37m12TxX-nqjuIJurQdeXydsSakco9t_O7jgBbQ6y115xxdDb8IonFZbM86zgRDLcvUmeOSJuDmZybD_6JaTX0zpbQ&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at > java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fThreadPoolExecutor.java%3a1136&c=E,1,1vNFV-mDaLK92lJo0Mq6jvkCDzuwrSHT4lp1nB6KTzOCSO6comH5xNpEcvtZ_9pc0cQCD2kgDfB5xdxg0tAX2dF5oG5DHY6kxWXOBLnuAwiz1BkEFhw,&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ > Worker.run > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fWorker.run&c=E,1,aLydz0SGsclotqCro2upcTg44B_Ij7ckjApLu4B5JUwZKKdMo5z3RyUR4ikHFY8L3t_yB87Zp5atGRwoAPA1L9Mc9c681UjFrG16n-udVjeHtxQNxx8V-Nug&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fThreadPoolExecutor.java%3a635&c=E,1,1mZX-u-XHEZ_e4Ut7YETRvWm7U_qkC-q9QaPeHah4K4yNl5foyM1VSExCtYiisknkelDj6_K2MUHGc65Kd-6-JG_TXLby0OPWodJVjX3BtKaDNBUzusgpzT6ajL7&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.ActiveMQThreadFactory$ > 1.run > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2f1.run&c=E,1,-nbEPDxI7J-DFvbJfVVt2Cs1Vi_hN5bw-8vQF3SlM1nthw3VbJLWmS1h73cupUxqBoHCImTzDqI1m5gutx3ZriLpLpU7IqutHCqZuT6CTVWACPtj&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > (ActiveMQThreadFactory.java:118 > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fActiveMQThreadFactory.java%3a118&c=E,1,-lUcdhDzaHWdAWLCc0IxWCFkKtKHxoEd64GWhzXAbeuG_Zm9mvn624BY6uS8MgQn-s2TMF8PbEPYVbOOy6BJuI8ByeiuAF9Y8f2I5wib&typo=1&ancr_add=1> > ) > > > > [image: rg] > <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.redpointglobal.com%2f&c=E,1,T2UV-1dji1RODRcU4Ff4j_IzfTH2n47BatzyLZcEOU8VROFr3GS8re7CjDcnnHCSaPEtR-35J3z30dnYcz5K66rVsMVxgDiyh0FvEDKnN67naHjYbn0NpzAc&typo=1> > > *Lino Pereira * > > *C++ Developer, Redpoint Global Inc. * > > 34 Washington Street, Suite 205 Wellesley Hills, MA 02481 > > lino.pere...@redpointglobal.com > > > PLEASE NOTE: This e-mail from Redpoint Global Inc. (“Redpoint”) is > confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to > whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer > and do not copy, print or disclose it to anyone else. If you properly > received this e-mail as a customer, partner or vendor of Redpoint, you > should maintain its contents in confidence subject to the terms and > conditions of your agreement(s) with Redpoint. > > > PLEASE NOTE: This e-mail from Redpoint Global Inc. (“Redpoint”) is > confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to > whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer > and do not copy, print or disclose it to anyone else. If you properly > received this e-mail as a customer, partner or vendor of Redpoint, you > should maintain its contents in confidence subject to the terms and > conditions of your agreement(s) with Redpoint. >
