Raymond,

Did you submit the JIRA for this?

My company e-mail strips out the URL for the JIRA request included earlier.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 2:28 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Native Oauth/OIDC integration in ActiveMQ

Hi Raymond—

This is good info— can you make a JIRA for with it?

Thanks!
Matt Pavlovich

> On Nov 1, 2023, at 1:58 PM, ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> What I know from my time as a consultant is that it often goes like this.
> 
> The company:
> 
> 1. Requirement 1: We need secure authentication.
> 2. Requirement 2: We need to comply with standards.
> 3. Requirement 3: We need a technology-neutral way to authenticate.
> 
> The architects:
> 
> The conclusion is that OAuth is the standard way to authenticate, so 
> every software component (application, api, middleware) in the 
> enterprise must follow it.
> 
> How much sense it makes for each use case, that there are other 
> protocols (Kerberos, SAML, JAAS), that it may impact performance, that 
> it is only used internally, that oAuth has different workflows, that 
> it can complicate things and slow things down, it doesn't matter. I'm 
> not that familiar with JAAS, but if you bring this up to the 
> architects, they're probably going to say something like, "I don't 
> know JAAS. O, is it Java, then certainly not technology neutral and 
> secure. We were clear that OAuth is the enterprise standard”.
> 
> I'm not saying that's right, but this is often how it goes.
> 
> Raymond
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:04 PM SCOTT FIELDS 
> <scott.fie...@kyndryl.com.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> FYI, I'm awaiting the technical details from the AMQ admins on our 
>> side regarding the client use cases involved.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 12:45 PM
>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Native Oauth/OIDC integration in ActiveMQ
>> 
>> Can anybody clarify the use-case for this? What messaging protocols 
>> are in view here? I'd love to understand more. Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> Justin
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:27 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Scott-
>>> 
>>> Got it, makes sense. Please open a JIRA for the request:
>>> INVALID URI REMOVED
>>> _jira_&d=DwIFaQ&c=cCoa5WWAB7EEETJScYfkXg&r=LQqpejpmPovblCMRepcZSfPCN
>>> x6 
>>> OWpQ6tx9PqWhrghQ&m=nXztDtwq3oUC9PwBq8DSh1xJpsp8sEgsIJJgFfnOnXIEcWhXP
>>> nB O4nNZ-P0AcAvt&s=EsvNxmpIzKiaKvwq3i6NlRNPFd9sXiBiAoPA_ocaWtk&e=
>>> 
>>> We’ll be doing roadmap and planning for the next round of release 
>>> once
>>> 6.0.0 is out.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 31, 2023, at 4:22 PM, SCOTT FIELDS 
>>>> <scott.fie...@kyndryl.com.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, using certificate based authentication/authorization is a 
>>>> secondary
>>> approved method if OIDC isn't supported for this customer.
>>>> 
>>>> But...I wanted to pursue the OIDC mechanism, since that's the 
>>>> customer's
>>> primary solution.
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 3:19 PM
>>>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Native Oauth/OIDC integration in ActiveMQ
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Scott-
>>>> 
>>>> There is interest in adding this to Apache ActiveMQ. A DRAFT RP was
>>> started using JWT:
>>>> 
>>>> INVALID URI REMOVED
>>>> he_activemq_pull_1035&d=DwIFaQ&c=cCoa5WWAB7EEETJScYfkXg&r=LQqpejpmP
>>>> o 
>>>> vblCMRepcZSfPCNx6OWpQ6tx9PqWhrghQ&m=nXztDtwq3oUC9PwBq8DSh1xJpsp8sEg
>>>> s
>>>> IJJgFfnOnXIEcWhXPnBO4nNZ-P0AcAvt&s=wAemuHPk4ei6Ff2zo03Bsa1sco_3PB2a
>>>> -
>>>> dXkAYggG1A&e=
>>>> 
>>>> In general, using OAuth/OIDC may not be desirable as having 
>>>> background
>>> threads refreshing tokens can have negative side effects. The OAuth2 
>>> "AppAuth pattern" is something else to look into.
>>>> 
>>>> Have you considered two-way SSL authentication? Stronger security, 
>>>> with
>>> expiry and revocation support.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 31, 2023, at 2:17 PM, SCOTT FIELDS 
>>>>> <scott.fie...@kyndryl.com.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> To my knowledge, there is no native ActiveMQ integration for
>>> Authorization/Authentication via Oauth/OIDC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there any plan, if not, to include this, besides requiring an
>>> external JAAS method provided either by an external vendor or 
>>> require a custom coding front-end from the end-use provider?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If not, what's the best way to request this?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scott Fields
>>>>> Kyndryl
>>>>> Senior Lead SRE - BNSF
>>>>> 817-593-5038 (BNSF)
>>>>> scott.fie...@kyndryl.com<mailto:scott.fie...@kyndryl.com>
>>>>> scott.fie...@bnsf.com<mailto:scott.fie...@bnsf.com>
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to