Have you looked into message Groups? It seems messages connected to a different consumer during failover and redelivery happened.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:32 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey, Oliver. I apologize for the delay on this. It fell off my radar as > I've been concentrating on other tasks. > > For what it's worth, the community support [1] provided on the mailing list > is, as the website says, provided for free on a volunteer basis. I would > imagine that everybody on this list has a day job whose responsibilities > include things other than providing community support. This is certainly > true of me. > > I can't speak for anybody else in the community, but I hope to reproduce & > investigate your issue soon. Of course, anybody is free to do the same. The > community is one of the great things about Open Source. If you find your > support needs really go beyond what the community can provide then you > might consider one of the commercial options listed on the website [1]. > > Hope that helps! > > > Justin > > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/support > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:37 AM Oliver Lins <l...@lins-it.de> wrote: > > > Hi Justin, > > > > this question is created about 4 weeks ago. > > > > I can imagine that reproducing the unexpected behavior might take some > > time. > > But does it really takes that long? > > > > Do you still think that the dev team will give a feedback? > > > > Regards, > > Oliver > > > > > > On 4/12/23 10:10, Oliver Lins wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > asking again, is there any news concerning this question? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On 4/4/23 09:56, Oliver Lins wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> is there any news? > > >> > > >> Oliver > > >> > > >> On 3/28/23 10:28, Oliver Lins wrote: > > >>> Hi Justin, > > >>> > > >>> thanks for the info. Pls take the time it needs to analyze. > > >>> > > >>> Oliver > > >>> > > >>> On 3/27/23 20:27, Justin Bertram wrote: > > >>>> Not yet. I'm hoping to get to it at some point this week. I was out > > >>>> of the > > >>>> office last week. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Justin > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:31 AM Oliver Lins <l...@lins-it.de> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> is there any news concerning this question? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Oliver > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 3/16/23 13:59, Oliver Lins wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I've attached an archive containing the test apps, logs and a > readme > > >>>>>> file. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> If you have any questions pls let me know. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>> Oliver > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 3/15/23 16:31, Justin Bertram wrote: > > >>>>>>> I just need a way to reproduce what you're seeing so once you > > >>>>>>> get your > > >>>>>>> reproducer in order let me know. Thanks! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Justin > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:36 AM Oliver Lins <l...@lins-it.de> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Justin, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> thank you for your fast reply. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > Would it be possible for you to work up a way to reproduce > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> behavior you're seeing? > > >>>>>>>> Yes, I can reproduce the behavior. I have simplified producer > and > > >>>>>>>> consumer Java code to reproduce. > > >>>>>>>> The code is not yet the bare minimum necessary to work, but I > can > > >>>>>>>> change > > >>>>>>>> that. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > If so, is the order-of-creation only essential per > > >>>>>>>> producer [...] > > >>>>>>>> Yes, the order is only essential per producer. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know how I can assist you. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>>>> Oliver > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 3/15/23 14:58, Justin Bertram wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Based on your description, attached configuration, and logs I > > >>>>>>>>> don't > > >>>>>>>>> see > > >>>>>>>>> anything wrong, per se. Would it be possible for you to work > up a > > >>>>>>>>> way to > > >>>>>>>>> reproduce the behavior you're seeing? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Do you ever have more than 1 producer? If so, is the > > >>>>>>>>> order-of-creation > > >>>>>>>> only > > >>>>>>>>> essential per producer or is it essential across all producers? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Justin > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 8:29 AM Oliver Lins <l...@lins-it.de> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> we are using Artemis with the following setup: > > >>>>>>>>>> - 2 independent broker instances (on 2 hosts) > > >>>>>>>>>> - a cluster configuration to create a Core bridge between both > > >>>>>>>>>> instances > > >>>>>>>>>> (no failover, no HA) > > >>>>>>>>>> - multiple JMS clients produce and consume AMQP messages > > >>>>>>>>>> using topics > > >>>>>>>>>> - the clients do a failover themself > > >>>>>>>>>> - Artemis versions (2.21.0, 2.29.0-SNAPSHOT cloned on 08.03) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Every thing is working fine. Independent of the Artemis > > >>>>>>>>>> instance the > > >>>>>>>>>> producer or consumers are connected to they receive all > messages > > >>>>>>>>>> in the > > >>>>>>>>>> order of creation. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> To simulate a server failure we kill (-9) Artemis instance 1 > and > > >>>>>>>>>> restart > > >>>>>>>>>> the instance again (~ 1/2 minute later). > > >>>>>>>>>> - 1 producer connects to the restarted instance 1 > > >>>>>>>>>> - multiple consumers are (still) connected to instance 2 > > >>>>>>>>>> - 1 consumer connects to the restarted instance 1 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> The producer sends messages with a delay of 1 ms. > > >>>>>>>>>> Now we see that > > >>>>>>>>>> - the order of messages received by the consumer connected to > > >>>>>>>>>> instance 1 > > >>>>>>>>>> frequently does not match the order the messages are created > > >>>>>>>>>> - the order of messages received by consumers connected to > > >>>>>>>>>> instance 2 > > >>>>>>>>>> matches the order the messages are created > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> It is essential for us that the messages arrive in the order > of > > >>>>>>>> creation. > > >>>>>>>>>> Do you have any ideas what went wrong or we are doing wrong? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, > > >>>>>>>>>> Oliver > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Pls note: the attached files are used to reproduce what we > > >>>>>>>>>> saw in > > >>>>>>>>>> production. > > >>>>>>>>>> This test configuration uses 1 docker instance per > > >>>>>>>>>> Artemis > > >>>>>>>>>> broker. > > >>>>>>>>>> Both instances are running on the same host using > > >>>>>>>>>> different > > >>>>>>>>>> ports. > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Dipl.-Ing. FH der technischen Informatik > > >>>>>>>> Tel.: +49 179 2911883 > > >>>>>>>> Email: ol...@lins-it.de > > >>>>>>>> Internet: > > >>>>>>>> http://www.lins-it.de > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Dipl.-Ing. FH der technischen Informatik > > >>>>> Tel.: +49 179 2911883 > > >>>>> Email: ol...@lins-it.de > > >>>>> Internet: > > >>>>> http://www.lins-it.de > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > Dipl.-Ing. FH der technischen Informatik > > Tel.: +49 179 2911883 > > Email: ol...@lins-it.de > > Internet: > > http://www.lins-it.de > > > > > -- Clebert Suconic
