Hello. Thanks for your answer. I've tested it, and it seems to work. Indeed I was thinking this could not be a real risk with such a small gap between versions, but I always prefer to ask experts.
Thanks again. Regards. Le lun. 26 déc. 2022 à 16:13, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > 5.16.x is *really* similar to 5.17.x right now. Especially with the clients. > You should be fine for a while. > > -Matt > > > On Dec 26, 2022, at 2:36 AM, Ephemeris Lappis <ephemeris.lap...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > If I'm not wrong, ActiveMQ server is built and runs for JDK 8 until > > version 5.16 included, and for JDK 11+ starting with 5.17. > > > > To ensure compatibility of our applications that currently run with an > > old Red-Hat Fuse AMQ 5.11, we plan to install new brokers with a > > recent version 5.17.x, but can't update the application clients for > > now, since all our technical stack still relies on JDK 8. A JDK > > upgrade is planned for next year, but will probably be a progressive > > work$. > > > > What would be your advice about using a client version 5.16.x for JDK > > 8 based applications ? Is there any risk of breaking change ? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Regards. >
