You are likely hitting the bug I fixed at:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4098

I introduced a Thread Local Leakage. I thought by setting
threadLocal.set(null) I would be clearing it... and in fact I just
updated the threadLocal variable with null.

That ThreadLocal is created for every new session.


I was going to start a release today but I couldn't start it today as
I'm a bit sick today. I should be able to start a release tomorrow and
then you could try it out.


your other option would be to cherry-pick the change and build the
version yourself so you can run it in production.

On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 4:27 PM Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some more info about it here https://netty.io/wiki/tcp-fast-open.html
>
> Given that Netty can makes use of it and Artemis can as well: if it's not
> present in the doc it means we need to expose it in the acceptor
> configuration (for epoll) and...we love contributions :)
> But I suggest first to give it a shot first in a test env to see if it
> solves your problem!
>
> Il ven 3 giu 2022, 22:21 Ben Warrick <horseatingwe...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi Francesco,
> >
> > I don't find anything in the Artemis docs about TCP_FAST_OPEN. It must not
> > be an exposed configuration on Artemis? Where do I find more on this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 4:08 PM Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Are coming, not commenting: typo introduced by the the phone, sorry!
> > >
> > > Il ven 3 giu 2022, 22:07 Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ben,
> > > >
> > > > You can use TCP_FAST_OPEN on Artemis acceptors in case connections are
> > > > commenting from the came clients (I don't remember if is an exposes
> > Netty
> > > > configuration) or...submit a PR to let Artemis separate (multiple)
> > > threads
> > > > to accept connections but, as you said, this is just an anti-pattern
> > and
> > > in
> > > > order to reduce the client code you can think about using a transparent
> > > > connection pooling mechanism, instead.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Il ven 3 giu 2022, 21:55 Ben Warrick <horseatingwe...@gmail.com> ha
> > > > scritto:
> > > >
> > > >> I'm running Artemis 2.14, and one of the systems publishing to it
> > > creates
> > > >> a
> > > >> lot of separate tasks -- from its perspective. I can see on Artemis
> > that
> > > >> the Total connection count vs Total messages acknowledged is pretty
> > > close,
> > > >> so it's apparent that the client system is making use of the
> > > anti-pattern
> > > >> of creating a new connection for each message it publishes. I don't
> > have
> > > >> access to the client system implementation, but is there anything I
> > can
> > > do
> > > >> on the Artemis end to make it more efficient? Latency with this system
> > > is
> > > >> becoming an issue. Also every 30 minutes or so there is a spike in CPU
> > > >> usage (~50%) which I assume is garbage collection. During that spike
> > > >> message publishing slows down a lot.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Ben
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to