To complete Justin’s answer, you can also listen the feather cast about ActiveMQ:
https://feathercast.apache.org/2021/09/07/apache-activemq/ Regards JB > Le 19 déc. 2021 à 06:52, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> a écrit : > > The short answer is that ActiveMQ Artemis is the next generation broker > from ActiveMQ. It is based on a high-performance, non-blocking architecture > for improved scalability and performance, an architecture designed to > enable modern messaging use-cases (e.g. high-volume, low-latency > asynchronous microservices, etc.). The goal, as I understand it, is for > Artemis to be ActiveMQ's platform of the future. That said, ActiveMQ > "Classic" has a large user-base given that it's been the de facto > open-source JMS server since 2007 so I can't imagine that it will be > summarily abandoned. I think there are lots of users out there who can't or > won't upgrade for all kinds of different reasons, and there are developers > in the community who are committed to supporting "Classic." > > As you note, both "Classic" and Artemis share many of the same features > which is no surprise as many migrating users will want those features for a > smooth transition. Of course there are differences between the feature sets > as well. You can peruse the documentation for more details on that. > > The long answer is that a few years after ActiveMQ was first released (back > in 2007) the chair of the ActiveMQ Project Management Committee here at > Apache (i.e. Hiram Chirino) and a couple other developers in the community > started looking at ways to deal with the performance and scalability > limitations inherent in the broker's architecture. They ultimately created > an ActiveMQ subproject called "Apollo" where these ideas were fleshed out. > An Apollo 1.0 release was announced in early 2012. At the time of this 1.0 > release the Apollo subproject was designed to be ActiveMQ's platform of the > future. However, the early excitement around Apollo never coalesced into > sustainable momentum. In my opinion this was mainly due to the fact that > Apollo was written in Scala rather than Java which was used by ActiveMQ. > However, the architectural underpinnings were solid and not terribly > different from what was being implemented in the JBoss community in the > HornetQ broker. In 2016 the community of developers around HornetQ > approached the ActiveMQ community to discuss donating the HornetQ code-base > to Apache with the goal of creating the best of both worlds - an ActiveMQ > broker with all the great features and usability that the community had > come to expect along with a high-performance, non-blocking architecture for > the next generation of messaging applications. The donation was accepted > and the aforementioned goal has been in progress ever since. > > I hope that helps answer some of your questions. > > > Justin > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 7:48 PM domson.t...@outlook.com < > domson.t...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> I was wondering what is the difference between ActiveMQ classic and >> artemis? >> I found most feature of them are very similar, why artemis is devleped? >> If ActiveMQ classic will be abandoned in future? >>
