I like this idea. I think the preference would probably just need to change
to be which tab is selected by default.


Justin

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:20 AM Dondorp, Erwin
<erwin.dond...@cgi.com.invalid> wrote:

> Sometimes the shortest responses are the most useful!
> thx,
> e.
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Domenico Francesco Bruscino <bruscin...@gmail.com>
> Verzonden: donderdag 11 november 2021 14:07
> Aan: users@activemq.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Re: Browse Queue (message view) using tabs proposal
>
>
> EXTERNAL SENDER:   Do not click any links or open any attachments unless
> you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
> EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE:    Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce
> jointe à moins qu’ils ne proviennent d’un expéditeur fiable, ou que vous
> ayez l'assurance que le contenu provient d'une source sûre.
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 17:01, Dondorp, Erwin <erwin.dond...@cgi.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > [repost, now with the image as a link] Hello,
> >
> > One of the screens that I use often is the Browse Queue screen for a
> > single message, so that I can verify all details of the message.
> > The screen has some logic to decide on the representation that should
> > be used. In some cases, multiple representations are selected, e.g.
> text+hex.
> >
> > I would like to transform the viewing area for the message body to a
> > tabulated area, where each tab holds a single representation.
> > The tabs may not be all visible for all message types.
> > See the mocked screen at
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.dondorp.com/screen.png__;!!AaIhyw!8nhYysRLpwdTweB_DdNww7SfJhIE-qV5i_Ta0S-T-cctrdSsukvFd-GowR39rvaO$
> .
> >
> > This proposal may make the preference setting "Browse Bytes Messages"
> > obsolete.
> > This proposal may make it easier to add more representations, e.g. a
> > detailed payload view for amqp.
> > But I do not propose decoders based on contentType/contentEncoding.
> >
> > The intention of this e-mail is to get first reactions that may change
> > the idea...
> >
> > Erwin
> >
>

Reply via email to