Hi, I don't think the conflict is related to jetty-all use.
Let me try to reproduce it first. But clearly, it's related to the fact you are embedding ActiveMQ in Tomcat. Regards JB On 29/11/2019 07:56, Naveen Kumar wrote: > Hi JB, > > Thanks for the quick response. Is there any way I can fix the existing > problem of JSR-356 conflicts with tomcat ? > I can see something related to this was mentioned here > http://activemq.apache.org/tomcat.html and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6154 > But somehow it didn't help me. > > Thanks > Naveen > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:53 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> ActiveMQ 5.15.11 uses Jetty 9.4.22, using jetty-all artifact. >> >> It's just fine for ActiveMQ standalone. Anyway, I will improve (mostly >> to reduce the Jetty deps volume). >> >> If you use ActiveMQ in Karaf, you don't have the issue as Jetty >> artifacts are already provided by Karaf. >> >> I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7358 to do the >> change for 5.16.0. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 29/11/2019 06:48, Naveen Kumar wrote: >>> As per the below post at Jetty, the jar jetty-all should not be used by >> any >>> other projects. >>> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jetty-users/msg06030.html >>> Can someone please help to confirm if my understanding is correct that >>> activemq-all-5.15.10.jar has a dependency on >>> jetty-all-9.4.19.v20190610-uber.jar ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Naveen >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
