That message appears to have been delayed by several years. Lest anyone get confused by the recency of the timestamp, LevelDB is no longer supported within ActiveMQ, and anyone who chooses to use it as the persistent store should be prepared to debug and fix problems without assistance from the mailing list.
Tim On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, 5:54 PM danielbiggs <danielbiggs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The two stores are similar in that they both utilize an index to track the > location and state of messages written into a Journal. The differences lay > in the way in which the index is implemented among other things. LevelDB is > a slightly faster index than KahaDB and can provide somewhat better > performance numbers. In later releases of ActiveMQ the LevelDB store also > supports replication. > > Given that you are on an older release where the LevelDB store > implementation was still very young I'd recommend sticking with KahaDB as > it > is much more mature and has many of the early bugs worked out. The LevelDB > store in 5.8 is not really production-ready and will probably cause you > some > trouble. You can move to the newest release v5.10 and LevelDB will be much > more robust. > > Buy etinax <https://www.buyetilaam.com/product/etinax/ > > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
