Phu, You can use any shared filesystem for storing the data, but to act as the shared lock, the filesystem must support specific lock operations. NFSv4 supports those options. NFSv3 and before does not. Other filesystems may or may not, though your experiment makes it sound like ESXi may not.
However, via the pluggable storage locker feature ( https://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers), you can use a different technology for the shared lock than you use for the data. So you could store your data in EXSi but use a JDBC database for the lock, for example. Tim On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 6:13 PM Arshkr <phu.ngu...@unisys.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Thank you for your reply. > Yes, I have read this document before, and master/slave concept is clear to > me. My big question is on NFS shared file system where ActiveMQ is writing > data on. > I have only one option for this setup is to use NFS shared file system for > the data directory. I don't know if NFSv4 is the only option or there is > another alternative such as local file share storage vs. network file share > or not. > > > Regards, > Phu Nguyen. > > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
