Hi So perf doesnt increase by having more slaves. Having a cluster setup with multiple masters (note every master would need a slave) or if you use amqp protocol using federated clusters with qpid dispatch router would deal help with this. If you need to protect from single server / single az failure, then a simple master/slave setup would cover this. (As long as you deploy master in one AZ and slave in another)
Mike Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: schalmers <[email protected]> Date: 03/10/2018 00:56 (GMT+00:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Designing for maximum Artemis performance I'm not sure I understand your question(s) @clebertsuconic? We are building highly scalable systems and highly distributed systems, so the need for the multiple backups is there to ensure that in the unlikely event of a server or AZ failure, our systems still run at the maximum available performance of Artemis, at all times. If a master server in a cluster stops running for whatever reason, how do we ensure it becomes the master again if there are two slaves/backups in the 'backup groups' ? -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
