@Dan: what about this:

you provide us a code path that could generate the incompatibility in 2.1.0...

an ultimate deal would be if you produced a compatibility test with
2.1.0.... you add some code that will generate the journal with 2.1.0,
and then consume the messages on master (or 2.6.x)...


if you generate the compatibility test showing the issue, we can try fixing it.


What about this idea? that would help you migrate into 2.6.x or master.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Dan Langford <danlangf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you that was very helpful. we actually do have an address settings
>> entry for each queue. there could be a better pattern for us. but currently
>> our automated system for creating queues creates an address setting at the
>> same time. i will look into improved patterns.
>>
>> as far as upgrading goes. i agree we really want to upgrade. until i can
>> find a work around for the config-delete-queues deserialization bug
>> introduced in 2.2.0 i brought up back in April we will not be able to
>> easily move.
>
> You should be able to move to 2.6.2. if you're not able to I would
> like to know where it failed.
>
>
>>
>> thanks again for all the help
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:56 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If you do not want to upgrade for any reason export the journal. Cleani
>>> uo.  Edit the text and remove the garbage (you will see) manually.   Delete
>>> all data and te import.
>>>
>>> (Make a backup to be safe of course)
>>>
>>>
>>> But I still recommend the upgrade.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:54 AM Clebert Suconic <
>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The address setting is the garbage I was talking about.  Upgrade to the
>>> > latest broker and there will be a cleanup done at the load before it
>>> > starts.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I highly recommend upgrade.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:05 AM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Analyzing thread dumps like this is pretty simple.  I generally just
>>> >> scroll
>>> >> through and look for long stack-traces with lots of calls from
>>> >> org.apache.activemq.artemis.  In your case every single thread dump has
>>> a
>>> >> thread doing something like this:
>>> >>
>>> >> "main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f902800eb20 nid=0x74fe runnable
>>> >> [0x00007f9031675000]
>>> >>    java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.settings.impl.HierarchicalObjectRepository.getPossibleMatches(HierarchicalObjectRepository.java:373)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.settings.impl.HierarchicalObjectRepository.getMatch(HierarchicalObjectRepository.java:192)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.paging.impl.PagingManagerImpl.reapplySettings(PagingManagerImpl.java:113)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.paging.impl.PagingManagerImpl.onChange(PagingManagerImpl.java:108)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.settings.impl.HierarchicalObjectRepository.onChange(HierarchicalObjectRepository.java:348)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.settings.impl.HierarchicalObjectRepository.addMatch(HierarchicalObjectRepository.java:168)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.settings.impl.HierarchicalObjectRepository.addMatch(HierarchicalObjectRepository.java:147)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.settings.impl.HierarchicalObjectRepository.addMatch(HierarchicalObjectRepository.java:120)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl.recoverStoredConfigs(ActiveMQServerImpl.java:2424)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl.loadJournals(ActiveMQServerImpl.java:2374)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl.initialisePart2(ActiveMQServerImpl.java:2219)
>>> >>     - locked <0x0000000080a8fce8> (a
>>> >> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.SharedNothingLiveActivation.run(SharedNothingLiveActivation.java:109)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl.internalStart(ActiveMQServerImpl.java:518)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl.start(ActiveMQServerImpl.java:466)
>>> >>     - locked <0x0000000080a8fce8> (a
>>> >> org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.integration.FileBroker.start(FileBroker.java:111)
>>> >>     - locked <0x000000008098be80> (a
>>> >> org.apache.activemq.artemis.integration.FileBroker)
>>> >>     at org.apache.activemq.artemis.cli.commands.Run.execute(Run.java:73)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.cli.Artemis.internalExecute(Artemis.java:148)
>>> >>     at org.apache.activemq.artemis.cli.Artemis.execute(Artemis.java:95)
>>> >>     at org.apache.activemq.artemis.cli.Artemis.execute(Artemis.java:122)
>>> >>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>> >>     at
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>> >>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>> >>     at
>>> org.apache.activemq.artemis.boot.Artemis.execute(Artemis.java:129)
>>> >>     at org.apache.activemq.artemis.boot.Artemis.main(Artemis.java:49)
>>> >>
>>> >> In every case it's the "main" thread which isn't surprising as that is
>>> the
>>> >> thread responsible for starting the broker.  Also, you can pretty
>>> clearly
>>> >> see in the trace that this is the thread starting the broker, it's
>>> loading
>>> >> the journals, & restoring stored configuration (either address settings
>>> or
>>> >> security settings).  I've seen high broker start times when there are
>>> lots
>>> >> and lots of addresses and lots of and lots of settings.  Do either (or
>>> >> both) of these situations apply to you?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Justin
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Dan Langford <danlangf...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Dang I can’t easily upgrade past 2.1.0 because of the
>>> >> config-delete-queues
>>> >> > deserialization bug introduced in 2.2.0. Unless that bug was squashed
>>> in
>>> >> > 2.6+. I don’t think I made a jira for it (vacation and work load) but
>>> we
>>> >> > discussed it back in April. I should go confirm that bug on 2.6 and
>>> >> make a
>>> >> > jira for that
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks
>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:46 PM Clebert Suconic <
>>> >> clebert.suco...@gmail.com
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > There is an issue I remember where the journal would have some dirt
>>> >> that
>>> >> > > was fixed on 2.3/0.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I would ipgrade to 2.6.2.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:34 PM Dan Langford <danlangf...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >> > > wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > would you be willing to help me translate these thread dumps?
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > i attached a Zip file with some thread dumps in them. i will also
>>> >> share
>>> >> > > > the fasthread.io links for each file. (i was struggling getting
>>> >> > > > fastthread to do a combo report with the threads in the correct
>>> >> order)
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1525 https://goo.gl/d88azU
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1530 https://goo.gl/G78qn3
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1535 https://goo.gl/aMBSBw
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1540 https://goo.gl/brKxxk
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1545 https://goo.gl/RaXXCs
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1550 https://goo.gl/r5dndK
>>> >> > > > artemis04-20180719-1555 https://goo.gl/YJRLxe
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > at :35, :45, and :55 the young+old gen space gets bigger than at
>>> the
>>> >> > > other
>>> >> > > > sample times. but i dont know what to look for in here to
>>> determine
>>> >> > what
>>> >> > > > the broker is actually during during this time.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > thanks
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:42 AM Justin Bertram <
>>> jbert...@apache.org
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >> The first place I would start is grabbing thread dumps every so
>>> >> often
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > > >> see what the broker is actually doing during the 30+ minutes.
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >> Justin
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Dan Langford <
>>> >> danlangf...@gmail.com>
>>> >> > > >> wrote:
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > >> > so my server startup times and failover times are growing
>>> pretty
>>> >> > big.
>>> >> > > >> but i
>>> >> > > >> > dont really know where to start looking.
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > here is a snippet of some logs to show you the time stamps:
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:31,801 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.
>>> >> > integration.bootstrap]
>>> >> > > >> > AMQ101000: Starting ActiveMQ Artemis Server
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:31,818 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221000:
>>> >> > > >> > live Message Broker is starting with configuration Broker
>>> >> > > Configuration
>>> >> > > >> > (clustered=true,journalDirectory=./data/
>>> >> > journal,bindingsDirectory=./
>>> >> > > >> > data/bindings,largeMessagesDirectory=./data/large-messages,
>>> >> > > >> > pagingDirectory=./data/paging)
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,462 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221012:
>>> >> > > >> > Using AIO Journal
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,493 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221057:
>>> >> > > >> > Global Max Size is being adjusted to 1/2 of the JVM max size
>>> >> (-Xmx).
>>> >> > > >> being
>>> >> > > >> > defined as 1,073,741,824
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,555 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221043:
>>> >> > > >> > Protocol module found: [artemis-server]. Adding protocol
>>> support
>>> >> > for:
>>> >> > > >> CORE
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,555 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221043:
>>> >> > > >> > Protocol module found: [artemis-amqp-protocol]. Adding protocol
>>> >> > > support
>>> >> > > >> > for: AMQP
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,556 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221043:
>>> >> > > >> > Protocol module found: [artemis-hornetq-protocol]. Adding
>>> >> protocol
>>> >> > > >> support
>>> >> > > >> > for: HORNETQ
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,556 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221043:
>>> >> > > >> > Protocol module found: [artemis-mqtt-protocol]. Adding protocol
>>> >> > > support
>>> >> > > >> > for: MQTT
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,556 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221043:
>>> >> > > >> > Protocol module found: [artemis-openwire-protocol]. Adding
>>> >> protocol
>>> >> > > >> support
>>> >> > > >> > for: OPENWIRE
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:11:34,556 INFO  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ221043:
>>> >> > > >> > Protocol module found: [artemis-stomp-protocol]. Adding
>>> protocol
>>> >> > > support
>>> >> > > >> > for: STOMP
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,963 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222165:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Dead Letter Address configured for queue DLQ in AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,963 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222166:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Expiry Address configured for queue DLQ in AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,983 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222165:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Dead Letter Address configured for queue ExpiryQueue in
>>> >> > > AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,983 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222166:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Expiry Address configured for queue ExpiryQueue in
>>> >> AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,984 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222165:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Dead Letter Address configured for queue example in
>>> >> AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,985 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222166:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Expiry Address configured for queue example in AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,985 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222165:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Dead Letter Address configured for queue exampleQueue in
>>> >> > > AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > 08:41:38,986 WARN  [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>>> >> > > AMQ222166:
>>> >> > > >> No
>>> >> > > >> > Expiry Address configured for queue exampleQueue in
>>> >> AddressSettings
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > and it continues. i have 138 queues. i wonder if i need to be
>>> >> > looking
>>> >> > > at
>>> >> > > >> > PAGE configuration or some cache sizes. do i need to be looking
>>> >> at
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > > >> > number of messages persisted on these queues? where would you
>>> >> look
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > > >> > determine why the startup times are so long?
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > also, i know i need to upgrade but i cannot upgrade off of
>>> 2.1.0
>>> >> due
>>> >> > > to
>>> >> > > >> > some deseralization changes introduced in 2.2.0. i think i have
>>> >> > > another
>>> >> > > >> > thread on here (that i need to update) regarding that upgrade
>>> >> issue.
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >> > thanks for any ideas or insight you have for me
>>> >> > > >> >
>>> >> > > >>
>>> >> > > > --
>>> >> > > Clebert Suconic
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> > --
>>> > Clebert Suconic
>>> >
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to