You are mixing network of brokers with master-slave setup. You don't need network definition in master-slave. In master slave connectivity is based on common storage. Master is simply a broker that has lock on storage, while slave is actively checking if lock can be acquired (because master died). Read up on http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html if you want to setup master - slave.
wt., 10.07.2018, 22:58 użytkownik avmpt <[email protected]> napisał: > I would like to set up an active passive broker pair and was unsure of what > to use for the networkConnector config settings. I can set up a connection > if i simply reference the other broker using a static url in my > activemq.xml > for amq-broker1 > > <networkConnectors> > > <networkConnector > name="broker1-broker2-topics" > uri="static:(tcp://amq-broker2:61616)"> > <excludedDestinations> > <queue physicalName=">" /> > </excludedDestinations> > </networkConnector> > </networkConnectors> > > But is this considered a master/slave pair or is this simply just a network > of brokers that will sync messages? What I would like is that amq-broker1 > is > the master and amq-broker2 is the passive so that it only runs/becomes > active if amq-broker1 goes down. I tried using master slave but I get > errors > because I only reference the slave (amq-broker2). I read somewhere that you > should not include the broker whose config you are setting in the list so > I'm not sure how to distingush amq-broker1 as master. > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
