This looks like the same behavior captured in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5730, which unfortunately has
been open and unworked since April 2015. I've added a comment to that story
noting that you hit the same problem and adding what I found based on my
searching in the source code.

Tim

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:14 PM, SriLavanyaPaleti <
srilavanya.pal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We implemented a queue which should retry the messages on it when there is
> an
> exception.
> This is done through ActiveMQ(5.11.1) and Spring. The requirement is to
> have
> the message processing parallel with the messages not being dependent on
> each others retry schedule.
>
> Issue  : When there are multiple messages are on the queue waiting for a
> redelivery after enabling the concurrency, the retry interval is not
> calculated properly.
>
> Here is an example :-
> Active MQ Settings
> RedeliveryCount - 3
> Retry Interval - 1 sec
> BackOffMultiplier - 5
> concurrent = 3-5
>
> There are 3 messages on queue waiting for  a redelivery.
>
> Scenario 1 :- How the queue is processed with concurrency set to 1?
> Message 1 - 1 second -> Message 2 - 1 second -> Message 3 - 1 second ->
> Message 1 -> 5 seconds, Message 2 - 25 seconds -> Message 3 - 125 seconds
> ->
> Message 1 - 625 seconds ...
>
> Scenario 2:- How the queue is processed with concurrency set to 3-5?
> Message 1 - 1 second -> Message 2 - 1 second -> Message 3 - 1 second ->
> Message 1 -> 5 seconds, Message 3 - 5 seconds -> Message 2 - 25 seconds ->
> Message 1 - 125 seconds ...
>
> Scenario 3:- How the queue is expected to be processed with concurrency set
> to 3-5?
> Message 1 - 1 second -> Message 2 - 1 second -> Message 3 - 1 second ->
> Message 1 -> 5 seconds, Message 2 - 5 seconds -> Message 3 - 5 seconds ->
> Message 1 - 25 seconds -> Message 3 - 25 seconds ..
> Scenario 3 follows the retry schedule for all the messages.
> 1, 5, 25.
>
> Is this a known issue ? If not, could anyone help me solve this.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-
> f2341805.html
>

Reply via email to