thank you Tim, >>Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to perform GET on: https://URL >>Reason: null >>>>>>at org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:33)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3] >>>>>>at org.apache.activemq.transport.http.HttpClientTransport.run(HttpClientTransport.java:205)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3] >>>>>>... 1 more >>Caused by: java.io.EOFException >>>>>>at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(Unknown Source)[:1.8.0_60] >>>>>>at org.apache.activemq.transport.util.TextWireFormat.unmarshal(TextWireFormat.java:52)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3] >>>>>>at org.apache.activemq.transport.http.HttpClientTransport.run(HttpClientTransport.java:196)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3] >>>>>>... 1 more
>>Is this the root cause of why your connections are already closed when >>trying to open sessions, etc.? If so, there's one of two possibilities: >>1. The broker is experiencing errors that cause it to close the connection >>prematurely. What do you see in the broker logs? Everything you've provided >>so far has been from the consumer's logs. >>2. The load balancer is experiencing behavior that cause it to terminate >>the connection prematurely, e.g. due to inactivity or other problems. If >>there's nothing in the broker's logs that indicates a problem, this would >>be the next place to dig into. for the IOException, we are seeing below problem clientID: ID:7450-51820-1521801292483-0:1 2018-03-23 06:35:01,302 58688438 [CustHttpTransportServer_1926295252-120] (org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:org.apache.activemq.transport.http.HttpTunnelServlet:175) WARN - The clientID header specified is invalid. Client sesion has not yet been established for it: ID:7450-51820-1521801292483-0:1 so, we are suspecting this is coming bcz blockingqueus are not able to create, in our n/w peer we removed networkConnector.addDynamicallyIncludedDestination condition because of this even blocking queues are also replicated which is causing this problem [assumption]. so blocking queues are created with *blockingQueue_<SOME NUMBER>* can you please suggest what pattern to exclude this blocking queue. or any other suggestions ? if we exclude blockingQueue_* or blockingQueue.* ? or any other way we need to follow ? please suggest -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
