Can you try a snapshot in master.. it sounds something I recently fixed.

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:45 AM, andi welchlin <andi.welch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, Howard.
>
> Created jiira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1542
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Howard Gao <howard....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you can do a jira for this. It surely sounds like a bug to me.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:41 PM, andi welchlin <andi.welch...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Looking into the code I think this could be a bug:
>> >
>> >
>> > I can see, that AMQPMessage.getAddress() can return null:
>> >
>> >
>> >    @Override
>> >    public String getAddress() {
>> >       if (address == null) {
>> >          Properties properties = getProtonMessage().getProperties();
>> >          if (properties != null) {
>> >             return properties.getTo();
>> >          } else {
>> >           *  return null;*
>> >          }
>> >       } else {
>> >          return address;
>> >       }
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> > But ServerSessionImpl.send() does not check for null, but it should. This
>> > is because SimpleString.toSimpleString() can return null if the input is
>> > null:
>> >
>> >
>> >     *  SimpleString address = message.getAddressSimpleString();*
>> >
>> >       if (defaultAddress == null && address != null) {
>> >          defaultAddress = address;
>> >       }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *   if (address == null) {         // We don't want to force a re-encode
>> > when the message gets sent to the consumer
>> > message.setAddress(defaultAddress);      }*
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > SimpleString:
>> >
>> >    public static SimpleString toSimpleString(final String string) {
>> >
>> >
>> > *  if (string == null) {         return null;      }*
>> >       return new SimpleString(string);
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > Andreas
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:06 AM, andi welchlin <andi.welch...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello all,
>> > >
>> > > I built active/active cluster with two brokers for my first tests. I
>> can
>> > > see in the log that the two brokers built a cluster. After startup
>> > > everything looks fine.
>> > >
>> > > I configured one queue and sent a message using AMQP 1.0 to broker1 and
>> > > tried to read it from broker2.
>> > >
>> > > But broker2 throws an exception and the message is not sent to the
>> > client:
>> > >
>> > > 09:34:53,146 ERROR [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
>> AMQ224016:
>> > > Caught exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.protocol.amqp.broker.
>> > > AMQPMessage.setAddress(AMQPMessage.java:612)
>> > [artemis-amqp-protocol-2.4.0.
>> > > jar:]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.protocol.amqp.broker.
>> > > AMQPMessage.setAddress(AMQPMessage.java:63)
>> > [artemis-amqp-protocol-2.4.0.
>> > > jar:]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.
>> > > ServerSessionImpl.send(ServerSessionImpl.java:1368)
>> > > [artemis-server-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.
>> > > ServerSessionImpl.send(ServerSessionImpl.java:1311)
>> > > [artemis-server-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.
>> > > ServerSessionImpl.send(ServerSessionImpl.java:1304)
>> > > [artemis-server-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.
>> > > ServerSessionPacketHandler.onSessionSend(ServerSessionPacketHandler.
>> > java:690)
>> > > [artemis-server-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.
>> > > ServerSessionPacketHandler.onMessagePacket(ServerSessionPacketHandler.
>> > java:290)
>> > > [artemis-server-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.Actor.doTask(
>> > Actor.java:33)
>> > > [artemis-commons-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase$
>> > > ExecutorTask.run(ProcessorBase.java:53) [artemis-commons-2.4.0.jar:2.
>> > 4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.
>> > > doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:42) [artemis-commons-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.OrderedExecutor.
>> > > doTask(OrderedExecutor.java:31) [artemis-commons-2.4.0.jar:2.4.0]
>> > >         at org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.actors.ProcessorBase$
>> > > ExecutorTask.run(ProcessorBase.java:53) [artemis-commons-2.4.0.jar:2.
>> > 4.0]
>> > >         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
>> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>> > > [rt.jar:1.8.0_151]
>> > >         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
>> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>> > > [rt.jar:1.8.0_151]
>> > >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [rt.jar:1.8.0_151]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The queue is not created on the fly but configured in the brokers, both
>> > > brokers have this config:
>> > >
>> > >   <queues>
>> > >        <queue name="awe.test.queue">
>> > >           <address>awe.test.queue</address>
>> > >           <durable>true</durable>
>> > >         </queue>
>> > >   </queues>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The cluster configuration is pretty much copied from the examples:
>> > >
>> > >       <!-- Clustering configuration -->
>> > >       <broadcast-groups>
>> > >          <broadcast-group name="my-broadcast-group">
>> > >             <group-address>${udp-address:231.7.7.7}</group-address>
>> > >             <group-port>9876</group-port>
>> > >             <broadcast-period>100</broadcast-period>
>> > >             <connector-ref>netty-connector</connector-ref>
>> > >          </broadcast-group>
>> > >       </broadcast-groups>
>> > >
>> > >       <discovery-groups>
>> > >          <discovery-group name="my-discovery-group">
>> > >             <group-address>${udp-address:231.7.7.7}</group-address>
>> > >             <group-port>9876</group-port>
>> > >             <refresh-timeout>10000</refresh-timeout>
>> > >          </discovery-group>
>> > >       </discovery-groups>
>> > >
>> > >       <cluster-connections>
>> > >          <cluster-connection name="my-cluster">
>> > >             <connector-ref>netty-connector</connector-ref>
>> > >             <retry-interval>500</retry-interval>
>> > >             <use-duplicate-detection>true</use-duplicate-detection>
>> > >             <message-load-balancing>STRICT</message-load-balancing>
>> > >             <max-hops>1</max-hops>
>> > >             <discovery-group-ref discovery-group-name="my-
>> > > discovery-group"/>
>> > >          </cluster-connection>
>> > >       </cluster-connections>
>> > >
>> > >       <!-- a colocated server that will allow shared store full backups
>> > to
>> > > be requested-->
>> > >       <ha-policy>
>> > >          <shared-store>
>> > >             <colocated>
>> > >                <backup-port-offset>100</backup-port-offset>
>> > >                <backup-request-retries>-1</backup-request-retries>
>> > >                <backup-request-retry-interval>2000</backup-request-
>> > > retry-interval>
>> > >                <max-backups>1</max-backups>
>> > >                <request-backup>true</request-backup>
>> > >                <master>
>> > >                   <failover-on-shutdown>true</failover-on-shutdown>
>> > >                </master>
>> > >                <slave>
>> > >                   <failover-on-shutdown>true</failover-on-shutdown>
>> > >                </slave>
>> > >             </colocated>
>> > >          </shared-store>
>> > >       </ha-policy>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I am using qpid-send and qpid-receive as test clients. So when the
>> client
>> > > sends it is done like:
>> > >
>> > > qpid-send -b localhost:9800 -a awe.test.queue '--connection-option={
>> > protocol:amqp1.0}'
>> > > --content-string 'test message Do 7. Dez 09:31:51 CET 2017'
>> --durable=yes
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > And there is a client which reads using:
>> > >
>> > > qpid-receive -b localhost:9802 -a awe.test.queue '--connection-option={
>> > protocol:amqp1.0}'
>> > > -t --timeout 500
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I think I misconfigured something but I can not imagine what it could
>> be.
>> > >
>> > > Btw. what protocol is used between the two brokers?
>> > >
>> > > I activated only the protocols AMQP and CORE.
>> > >
>> > > Any ideas?
>> > >
>> > > Kind Regards,
>> > > Andreas
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to