Your configuration looks OK to me. Do you have a reproducible test-case for this scenario?
Justin On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:24 AM, gkocur <grzegorz.ko...@softwaremill.com> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > What you described is exactly what I was expecting - current message count > close to 0. > I can see the number of journal files is growing, so sooner or later I'll > be > out of disk space. > The cluster configuration is pretty simple - it's symmetric cluster with > static configuration. > Cluster config on server1: > > <cluster-connections> > <cluster-connection name="my-cluster"> > <connector-ref>amqp-broker-0</connector-ref> > <retry-interval>500</retry-interval> > <use-duplicate-detection>true</use-duplicate-detection> > <message-load-balancing>ON_DEMAND</message-load-balancing> > <max-hops>1</max-hops> > <static-connectors> > <connector-ref>amqp-broker-1</connector-ref> > </static-connectors> > </cluster-connection> > </cluster-connections> > > Cluster config on server2: > > <cluster-connections> > <cluster-connection name="my-cluster"> > <connector-ref>amqp-broker-1</connector-ref> > <retry-interval>500</retry-interval> > <use-duplicate-detection>true</use-duplicate-detection> > <message-load-balancing>ON_DEMAND</message-load-balancing> > <max-hops>1</max-hops> > <static-connectors> > <connector-ref>amqp-broker-0</connector-ref> > </static-connectors> > </cluster-connection> > </cluster-connections> > > > Is it ok? > > > Justin Bertram wrote > > Queues named like "$.artemis.internal.sf." are internal queues used to > > move > > messages between nodes for things like server-side message load-balancing > > or message redistribution. As long as the cluster is formed properly > then > > messages should not accumulate there but should land there for just a > > moment before they are moved across the cluster bridge to the other node. > > I would expect the "Messages Added" stat to go up, but I would expect the > > "Message Count" to stay close to 0. > > > > Are you seeing any functional impact? > > > > > > Justin > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:03 AM, gkocur < > > > grzegorz.kocur@ > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a newbie question. > >> I'm playing with artemis clustering, and have simple setup like this: > >> > >> pruducer----artemis-server1----consumer1 > >> | > >> artemis-server2----consumer2 > >> > >> Messages are balanced to server2 exactly as described in documentation. > >> The > >> only issue I have with this setup is message acknowledgement - "Message > >> count" for queue > >> "$.artemis.internal.sf.ersules.f2a284aa-9c3b-11e7-96f2-062013112720" > (so > >> sent to server2) is growing, and "Messages acknowledged" is always 0. Is > >> it > >> expected behaviour? Or do I miss some configuration? > >> > >> Thank you for any help with this. > >> > >> -- > >> Grzegorz > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User- > >> f2341805.html > >> > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User- > f2341805.html >
