Hm.
  I have had experience with running (embedded) Artemis (in
Springframework) in a Docker Swarm. Most of what I had tried failed.
The main reason was that the virtual network adapters that are
available (sans any commercial and third-party ones) do not support
broadcast/multicast so dynamic discovery fails. The ones that did
support broadcast/multicast did not work properly when the swarm was
distributed over multiple nodes.

  I can not provide any code due to the commercial nature of the application.
  I can tell you how I solved it eventually: when running inside a
docker swarm instance doing an 'nslookup tasks.service-name' (replace
service-name with the actual service name) returns the IPs of all the
(current) instances of the service. Using that information (and
excluding the 127.*.*.*) I got the IPs of the other nodes in the
service. With that information and using a dedicated
ArtemisConfigurationCustomizer (from Springframework) I declared
static connectors to all the other nodes, and built the cluster using
static connectors only.
  Notice: I do not use XML configuration for Artemis, rather I use
Springframework for configuration.

  Parse tcp://x.x.x.x:yyyy/
  ...artemis.uri.ConnectorTransportConfigurationParser.newObject(URI, ?)

  Declare static connectors:
  ...artemis.core.config.Configuration.addConnectorConfiguration(String,
TransportConfiguration)

  Declare static connectors as cluster backbone:
  
...artemis.core.config.ClusterConnectionConfiguration.setStaticConnectors(List<String>)

  Add the static cluster configuration:
  
...artemis.core.config.Configuration.addClusterConfiguration(ClusterConnectionConfiguration)

  That's admittedly a lot of work, in many places: docker for set-up,
bash for lookup, Springframework for configuration, Artemis for
configuration. I believe it *could* be done more concisely, but I did
not see any interest in continuing that (and I still don't).


2017-09-28 11:27 GMT+03:00 Nick Stolwijk <nick.stolw...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks.
> I am looking now at Artemis and got it running through Rancher and Docker
> Swarm.
>
> Has anyone got information about service discovery for Artemis with Docker
> Swarm?
>
> Looking at the Kubernetes example I need to use some XSLT templates at
> deployment to create the right override configuration. Is that possible
> with Docker Swarm and Docker Compose?
>
> With regards,
>
> Nick Stolwijk
>
> ~~~ Try to leave this world a little better than you found it and, when
> your turn comes to die, you can die happy in feeling that at any rate you
> have not wasted your time but have done your best ~~~
>
> Lord Baden-Powell
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote:
>
>> Since you're looking for clustered operation, ActiveMQ Artemis sounds like
>> a better fit for your needs than ActiveMQ 5.x would be.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2017 3:49 PM, "Nick Stolwijk" <nick.stolw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We are just starting with Docker Swarm and we have 2 services that need
>> to
>> > talk to each other asynchronously. The messages need to be confirmed that
>> > they have been processed. So that when a container goes down, another
>> will
>> > pick it up.
>> >
>> > With these requirements I thought to use an MQ and with my experiences
>> with
>> > ActiveMQ in the past, that seemed the logical choice.
>> >
>> > After using my Google Fuu for some while, I couldn't find a working
>> example
>> > to run an ActiveMQ cluster in Docker Swarm. I was wondering if there is
>> > someone that got this to work and would share their experiences.
>> >
>> > FYI, We have looked at Kubernetes instead of Docker Swarm. We found out
>> > that Docker Swarm is easier to use and configure, although Kubernetes is
>> > more complete. We thought it wisely to start simple and once we mastered
>> > that and need more we can switch to Kubernetes.
>> >
>> > With regards,
>> >
>> > Nick Stolwijk
>> >
>> > ~~~ Try to leave this world a little better than you found it and, when
>> > your turn comes to die, you can die happy in feeling that at any rate you
>> > have not wasted your time but have done your best ~~~
>> >
>> > Lord Baden-Powell
>> >
>>

Reply via email to