On 07/31/2017 05:42 AM, MattFaulkner wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at using the scheduler for delaying a large number of messages.
However, when testing I notice there is a big performance difference between
having the AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY value and not.
I created a simple producer and sent 1 million messages.
WITH delay time taken - 2429 seconds
WITHOUT delay time taken - 264 seconds
Is this expected behaviour or am I missing something here?
Version: 5.13.2
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Schedule-Message-Delivery-Producer-Performance-tp4729053.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Not really sure what the measurement is based on given the lack of
details but I am not surprised that the scheduled message sends take
longer, the scheduler store is not a high performance message store and
I would not treat it as such. If you are blasting a million messages at
the broker with scheduled delay values then I'd maybe suggest that you
take a step back and reconsider some of the design choices that got you
there.
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
