Is the shared drive using a filesystem where distributed exclusive locks work correctly and reliably? NFSv4 is safe, NFSv3 isn't, and some others work while others don't. http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html has some details, though it's hardly an exhaustive list of all the shared filesystem that exist.
If your exclusive locks are working, the slave broker will fail to start (well, it'll start, but you'll see logs saying it's waiting to acquire the lock, and it won't accept any connections). If both brokers come up and accept connections at the same time, you don't have a master/slave pair, and you need to figure out why not before you can go any further with master/slave. Tim On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:10 PM, akpuvvada <akp4ti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > The paths configured for Kaha DB and data in broker attributes are same for > both instances - pointing to the same folder on the shared drive. > Anything else needs to be changed/added? > > Thanks > Anil > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Active-MQ-Master-Slave-Config-Not-working- > tp4728550p4728567.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
