Also: Notice that with Kafka you always require a write on the disk... if you are sending telemetry that you afford losing you may also opt for non persistent.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have written this blog post here: > > https://blogs.apache.org/activemq/entry/fast_messaging_with_artemis > > > You can combine that with using MAPPED at your journal type: > > > > > <!-- this could be ASYNCIO or NIO > > --> > > <journal-type>MAPPED</journal-type> > > > > ** BTW: I'm actually changing this text on "this could be ASYNCIO, > NIO.. adding MAPPED as well. > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:57 PM, wangqinghuan <1095193...@qq.com> wrote: >> I don't understand why activemq is so slowly. I read some design document >> about KafKa. In Kafka,data is immediately written to a persistence log on >> the filesystem without flushing to disk. In effect this just means that it >> is transferred into the kernel's pagecache. Does activemq have this style of >> pagecache-centric design? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-AvtiveMq-is-slowly-than-Kafka-tp4726911.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
