On 04/22/2017 05:56 PM, Steve Hill wrote:
We now realize that the number after the @ is the file number being
processed and after the colon is the offset in the file. Eg,
97226:18610005 means db-97226.log is being processed. Based on this at
least we now know how far we are through the startup. It looks like
it will take a further 2 hours to start, with a total startup time of
8 hours - this feels somewhat excessive!
Always good to include a version when asking for help.
On 4/22/17 4:53 PM, Steve Hill wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone provide guidance on why restarting ActiveMQ can take
hours? We were seeing lots of message not found in sequence and it
is currently at 5.9M entries recovered. Is there a way to know how
many entries there are so we have an idea when it might finish?
There are currently about 1600 files in the kahadb data directory and
the total size is 30GB of what about 700mb is the db.data file.
2017-04-22 16:28:21,079 | DEBUG | message not found in sequence id
index: ID:atas01p.x.com-57366-1491745186855-3:1:20207097:1:1 |
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
2017-04-22 16:28:21,082 | DEBUG | message not found in sequence id
index: ID:atas01p.x.com-57366-1491745186855-3:1:20207096:1:1 |
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
2017-04-22 16:28:21,187 | DEBUG | message not found in sequence id
index: ID:atas01p.x.com-57366-1491745186855-3:1:20462448:1:1 |
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
2017-04-22 16:30:56,681 | INFO | @97201:5488429, 5600000 entries
recovered .. | org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
2017-04-22 16:36:17,337 | INFO | @97210:5155402, 5700000 entries
recovered .. | org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
2017-04-22 16:41:45,794 | INFO | @97217:11700458, 5800000 entries
recovered .. | org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
2017-04-22 16:47:19,324 | INFO | @97226:18610005, 5900000 entries
recovered .. | org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
Steve.
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
