Thanks Andreas The article you introduced me was very helpful to understand the specification of kahaDB.
I have to say there was a miss-communication among our developer team. I heard that there was no pending queue in ActiveMQ, however, There were a lot of pending queue in ActiveMQ and that was the reason kahaDB journals were never deleted. I'm sorry.. (but thanks to you, I understood the it well.) After deleting pending queue in ActiveMQ GUI console, kahaDB journals were deleted. Thanks a lot. Kawai -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/The-size-of-KahaDB-doesn-t-seem-to-decrease-tp4723669p4723771.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
