Also make sure you haven't set an unreasonably short time for JMSExpiration.
On Feb 7, 2017 11:38 AM, "Timothy Bish" <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: > Check the configuration of the Constant Pending Message Limit Strategy: > http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html > > this could be tripping you up. > > On 02/07/2017 01:06 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > >> Since you are looking on other possibilities, take a look on >> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/ as well? >> >> >> >> Anyways, a non persistence message should be available to be received >> as long as you didn't stop the broker. The non persistent message >> means the message doesn't need to survive an eventual crash, but you >> should still receive it. Persistent only means the messages gets >> stored on the disk in between receiving and sending back to the client >> (all the way back to ack the message). >> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:16 AM, smith420 <hellosmith...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I have started with ActiveMQ just one day ago, so my knowledge on it is >>> limited.My target is to check the ActiveMQ stability and throughput in >>> different scenario for JMS message.So, following is one scenario.1. I am >>> publishing 1 mil non-persistent synchronous messages to topic and >>> subscribing it synchronously non durable manner. One publisher and one >>> subscriber.2. The broker, publisher and subscriber is up during the >>> test.Unfortunately nearly most of the times(only one time I got all >>> messages >>> out of 14 try), I am not getting all the messages(1 mil) in subscriber >>> end. >>> nearly 5500 messages are lost.I did the same test for tibco ems and ibm >>> mq >>> and did not get this issue.So, for ActiveMQ, if I need all messages to be >>> received, is it necessary to use persistent message and durable >>> subscriber >>> always?Don't think form the angle of guaranteed messaging or fail-over >>> scenario. Any suggestion is welcome.Thanks,Smith >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab >>> ble.com/Non-persistent-jms-message-get-lost-for-non-durable- >>> subscriber-tp4721717.html >>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Tim Bish > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >
