You have them networked, not clustered. ActiveMQ 5.x doesn't support clustering. it sounds like you want to use a master/slave pair instead: http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
On Dec 14, 2016 12:13 PM, "eladko" <e...@skyfence.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 activiemq services clustered, one of them is a master, and gets > all > the messages. > But when there's a failure and the other one gets to be the master, I need > the messages from the 1st to be processed as well, means I need those > messages to be copies to the 2nd (the master now), assuming that both > services are alive. > I'm trying to avoid the solution that both activemq will hold all the > messages at the same time. > For now, the slave have many messages that are "stuck" because no one tries > to take them. > > Any ideas? > Thanks. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Acitvemq-failover-move-messages-to-master-tp4720342.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
