Hello AJK, thank you for sharing your informations, i'm not expert in sonicMQ (CxMessenger) but as i see it's very easy to work with AMQ than last CxMessenger version, to configure, for some AMQ possibilities too like message routing, destination Interceptors, retroactive consumers, virtual & composite Destinations...
Kind regards. *BENNOUR HASSEN* *SOA **Architect **/ **Java **Software Engineer* 2016-08-08 16:42 GMT+02:00 ActiveMQ Investigation < ajay.ku...@winterflood.com>: > Hello Hassen, > > > > Reasons: > > 1. Our last upgrade of SonicMQ was 10 years ago. We would like to look at > alternatives as well. Specially when we are looking for a product for C++, > Java, Progress, c#.NET etc. So something which fits for all and with a > degree of high performance, scalability and reliability. > > 2. Why ActiveMQ - Openness - Most popular open source. We are comfortable > with Open Source space. Not tied to a single company. Thought about other > products like IBM one and RabbitMQ but ActiveMQ will do the job for us. We > don't do any complex stuff like network of brokers or constantly open and > close producer / consumers. > > 3. Benchmarking: > > Here is one of the queries posted by me in past. It includes links for > benchmarking I did. I must admit that it's based on our use case scenario > only. But overall, hopefully it will help. > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tc4712952.html > > It's for C++/Java/Progress (we say it spark). This is on like for like > system. > > Happy to help if any queries. > > Thanks > AJK > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/Who-uses-ActiveMQ-in-Finance-Banking-Markets- > tp4715117p4715141.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
