All kidding aside though (that was kind of rude on my part) that page you link does mention https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/ as the possible next gen.
Thanks! James On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Carr <james.r.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah... Kafka. > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:22 PM, rjrizzuto <raymond.rizz...@sig.com> wrote: > >> According to http://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html, Apollo >> is >> "unofficially declared dead". What does that mean for ActiveMQ? Is >> there a >> new "next-gen" candidate/heir apparent? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/roadmap-tp4703678.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
