Maybe I'm not using the network of brokers in the correct manner. Should a network of brokers be used for HA, or just scalability and load balancing?
We are not concerned with the loss of a few messages if one broker fails; however, we want to make sure there is not a single point of failure in the system (one broker node), and we want the client to failover seamlessly in the event of a failure (which is not currently happening... see previous message). I looked into master/slave setups, but each seems to have a single point of failure. The failure points in the shared filesystem and shared db configurations are obvious. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Network-of-Brokers-XAException-on-Failover-tp4702355p4702445.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
