That was exactly I did, however, the consumer did not get what the producer
sent. Is there any other thing cause it ?
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/26/2015 08:13 PM, Chaomei Lo wrote:
> > Thanks, Tim.
> >
> > Let me rephrase my question - is the Message class in the argument of
> > onMessage(...) under the 'cms' namespace ? So that I can write 'const
> > cms::Message* message' in below. That was what I used, but not work
> > properly.
>
> All CMS API classes exists in the cms:: namespace.
>
> #include <cms/MessageListener.h>
>
> class MyConsumer : public cms::MessageListener {
> public:
>
> virtual void onMessage(const cms::Message* message);
>
> }
>
> > // Called from the consumer since this class is a registered
> > MessageListener.
> > virtual void onMessage(const Message* message) {
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/26/2015 07:37 PM, mfan wrote:
> >>> I have constructed a customized Consumer class with the following line
> >>> (declare onMessage(..) in Consumer.hpp.
> >>>
> >>> /virtual void onMessage(const Message* message);
> >>> /
> >>>
> >>> I do not want to have "using namespace xxx" in header, so I need to
> >> identify
> >>> which Message object it passed to. I found a "Message.h" in
> >>> ~/activemq-cpp-library-3.8.4/src/main/cms, so I assume that it is, so I
> >>> added 'cms::' in above line, and thought it would solve the problem.
> >>> However, weird behavior happened, Instead of getting what the Producer
> >> has
> >>> just sent, the Consumer received something seems to be sent before. I
> >> have
> >>> restarted the CMS broker, it did not solve the problem. Did I use a
> >> wrong
> >>> namespace for Message ?
> >> It's not really clear what you did and what is happening so I can't say
> >> what might be the problem.
> >>
> >>> I checked the Message.h under 'cms' directory, it has 'CMS_API'
> >> declared
> >>> in front of the Message class,
> >>>
> >>> /class CMS_API Message {
> >>> /
> >>> What does the CMS_API do ?
> >> Ensures that on Windows the class has proper declspec exports for DLL
> >> interop
> >>
> >>> If I include all these following in header, then it works fine.
> >>>
> >>> /using namespace activemq::core;
> >>> using namespace decaf::util::concurrent;
> >>> using namespace decaf::util;
> >>> using namespace decaf::lang;
> >>> using namespace cms;
> >>> /
> >>>
> >>> Another question, in ActiveMQ-CPP example, there is an 'AMQCPP_UNUSED'
> >> pass
> >>> to the argument of the main() function. What does it mean ?
> >> Prevents the compiler on some platforms from emitting a warning that
> >> those args are not used as that is intentional.
> >>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-Message-object-in-arugment-of-onMessage-under-the-cms-namespace-tp4701425.html
> >>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tim Bish
> >> Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
> >> tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
> >> twitter: @tabish121
> >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
> tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>
