The new broker would be independent The existing broker is simply on the default installation. No "create" statement was used that would generate one of the seperate broker instance directory structures.
Our main concern here is leaving the current installation untouched and working, with no need to change any ports or code for that instance. So from what you're saying, if I simply create that second broker, which would create it's subdirectory structure under ./activeMQinstallpath/instance2/ , that will not only leave the initial installation untouched, but will allow me to fully modify the new broker for port config, as well as having it's own queue database, etc? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Adding-a-2nd-broker-to-a-default-installation-tp4700462p4700555.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
