Didn't you say in you SO question that you're using non-persistent messages? What makes you think a persistence store is causing problems if you're not persisting messages?
If you finish characterizing your problem, you should be able to narrow in on what the problem actually is; to me that seems like a better plan than taking guesses based on reading the wiki. On Jul 16, 2015 7:28 AM, "Kacu" <kacpe.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I found on AMQ site http://activemq.apache.org/leveldb-store.html that > "Both KahaDB and the LevelDB store have to do periodic garbage collection > cycles to determine which log files can deleted. In the case of KahaDB, > this > can be quite expensive as you increase the amount of data stored and can > cause read/write stalls while the collection occurs. The LevelDB store uses > a much cheaper algorithm to determine when log files can be collected and > avoids those stalls." > > So maybe my problem is happening because of KahaDB (I have -Xms1G -Xmx1G). > Maybe switch to LevelDB is a solution? > What do you think? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-uses-100-CPU-tp4699129p4699393.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
