tbain98 wrote > OK, so I finally got around to looking at your producer and consumer code > in BitBucket. So it looks like you're intentionally only consuming half > the messages you produce; is that right? If so, to what end? You never > mentioned this particular characteristic of your test; any reason you > didn't?
I am sorry, I should have been more clear about that. As I mentioned - "One sends messages to the virtual topic and another consumes from the queue of the virtual topic based on a selector." So, yes, the consumer does not care about all the messages sent to the virtualtopic/queue but is rather interested in only certain messages. The simplification of a scenario we use this is to pick messages from a stream of events. The events are pumped into a virtual topic and having multiple consumers subscribed to the corresponding queue allows us to run multiple instances of the consumer application (and thereby load balance the downstream processing). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-queues-of-virtual-topic-and-the-web-console-tp4689995p4690491.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
