god. the performance of replicated levelDB seems horrible here. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:19 PM, khandelwalanuj <khandelwal.anu...@gmail.com > wrote: > > I have done performance testing for kahadb, leveldb and replication > leveldb. > Details: > > *Scenario: * > > ActiveMQ : 5.10 > > Machine : Unix > > I tested performance by sending messages to the broker continuously with > > any sleep or wait on producer side and measure the throughput by messages > > sent per seconds. The throughput increase initially but after some some > it > > becomes constant. Similarly consumer is also running and consuming the > > messages. I also measure messages received per seconds. I can see that > > after some time producer and consumer throughput becomes equal. And that > > is what I consider as throughput. > > I run each test mentioned below for ~2 hours. > > I did all tests by sending persistence messages. > > *Results: > * > > *LevelDB: > * > 1 producer 1 consumer: 0.48K/sec(Queue) || 0.64K/sec (Topic) > 2 producer 1 consumer: 0.88K/sec(Queue) || 0.79K/sec (Topic) > 1 producer 2 consumer: 0.48K/sec(Queue) || 0.64K/sec (Topic) > > *kahaDB: > * > 1 producer 1 consumer: 0.58K/sec(Queue) || 0.6K/sec (Topic) > 2 producer 1 consumer: 0.6K/sec(Queue) || 0.6K/sec (Topic) > > *Replicated Leveldb: > * > 1 producer 1 consumer: 0.06K/sec(Queue) || 0.06K/sec (Topic) > 2 producer 1 consumer: 0.07K/sec(Queue) || 0.06K/sec (Topic) > 1 producer 2 consumer: 0.06K/sec(Queue) || 0.05K/sec (Topic) > > > Questions: > > > Performance is same with kahadb and leveldb which is strange. Why kahadb > > performance is now higher? Any particular configuration I need to tuneup > ? > > Does kahadb provides better performance with multiple producers and > single > > consumers ?(multiple writes) > > Replicated leveldb performance is too low. Almost 10 times going down. Is > > this expected ? Or I should tune some configurations to get better > > performance? > > Also If there is any testing done by ActiveMQ developers, please point me > to > that. > > Thanks, > Anuj > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Kahadb-vs-Leveldb-vs-Replciated-Leveldb-Performance-Results-tp4688306.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
-- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
