Can one of the experts or someone with JDBC Master/Slave deployment experience comment on this please? The documentation is ambiguous. Thanks, Anand
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Anand R <workana...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi - > I would like to know what type of Locker is recommended when using > jdbc persistence. I see that the configuration for mySQL in > http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-support.html does not mention anything > about the type of locker. > > In http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html, though the > Lease based locker is recommended over the Database Locker, the Lease-based > one is NOT mentioned as the default. > I followed the configuration in > http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-support.html, which I believe is using > the default Database locker. Are the problems mentioned with default locker > still valid? Should I consider moving to Lease-based? If so, why? and if > not, why not? > > Appreciate the help. > > Thanks, > Anand >
