ok.. that’s reasonable. Thanks for the reply.. I think what I’ll do is have some basic sanity assertions run periodically.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > It will depend on the queue depth b/c it is a linear search to find a > match. But all messages will be in memory so it will be quick. > On 15 Oct 2014 06:37, "Kevin Burton" <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > > > I have the need to check if a given item, with a specific key, is already > > in the queue, or scheduled for future execution. > > > > What’s the performance of this like? Is it relativity efficient? My > > requirements for this aren’t very high… I may be doing maybe 1-5% of my > > load with this type of query. > > > > Kevin > > > > -- > > > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > > … or check out my Google+ profile > > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > > <http://spinn3r.com> > > > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
