The following links states: http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html For those willing to try out new tech, the Replicated LevelDB Store gives speeds similar to a SAN solution without the hassle of having to setup a highly available shared file system.
During our testing with Replicated LevelDB, the hugh difference between the SAN and Replicated Leveldb With one queue we observed ~6000 msg/per sec with SAN, while replicated leveldb was about ~600 msg/per sec. Does anyone have any input on performance and if any tuning had to be done to achieve it? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/performance-Replicated-LevelDB-vs-SAN-tp4677811.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
