for that use case, use a transacted session for your consumer. It is only with a transacted session that you will be able to get exactly once semantics through failover and a guarantee on the delivery status via the jmsredelivery flag.
On 25 November 2013 16:23, Sophia Wright <sophiawrigh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response, > Will you please let me know something about my first post regarding Client > Acknowledgement Vs Transactions ? --> > "I have a requirement where I am confused between transactions and Explicit > acknowledgement. The requirement is: > When a consumer receives a message it do some processing with the message > before acknowledging the message. And while processing the message it could > get some exception and consumer might crash in the middle of processing the > message and when it comes up again, it should get the message. So since the > message is already consumed but could not be processed completely, i want to > get that message again. > > So here what should I use, transactions or explicit acknowledgement ? how to > get this redelivery of messages ? > > In addition to that I also want to know behavior of transactions on both > producer and consumer side. > Like client acknowledgement is only for consumer. Is transactions for both? > if yes, how differently it works for producer and consumer ? > " > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Transactions-in-ActiveMQ-tp4674759p4674823.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com
