also look at multi kahadb which allows you to split destinations
across stores, such that different usage patterns don't collide

http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html#KahaDB-Multi%28m%29kahaDBpersistenceadapter
http://blog.garytully.com/2011/11/activemq-multiple-kahadb-instances.html

On 22 November 2013 19:25, Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The checkpoint worker (which is responsible for determining which data
> log files should be removed) runs every 30 seconds.
>
> One can learn a lot about how the data log purge is happening by
> enabling its logger. See here for more details:
> http://activemq.apache.org/why-do-kahadb-log-files-remain-after-cleanup.html
> to your log4j.properties file.
>
> By examining the log output of the checkpoint worker one can determine
> which topics/queues contain unacknowledged messages which are in turn
> causing data logs (identified by their IDs) to be retained. More often
> than not the cause of unexpected data log retention is due to an
> offline durable subscriber and/or entries in the DLQ.
>
> If the checkpoint worker log output indicates that a lot of one's
> topics/queues (or perhaps all) have unacknowledged messages then
> perhaps the consumers are not acknowledging messages the way you
> thought they were.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM,  <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>> So once the message is removed from the DLQ, then the journal would clear in 
>> 30 seconds?  Is that post v5.8?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Barry Barnett
>> WMQ Enterprise Services & Solutions
>> Wells Fargo
>> Cell: 704-564-5501
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christian Posta [mailto:christian.po...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 10:23 AM
>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Producer Flow Block - Consumer Deadlock after max memory limits 
>> exceeded
>>
>> Right. It means that particular file that holds the message cannot be 
>> deleted/archived.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:48 AM,  <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>>> If there is a 'useful' artificat in the journal which is 'tied' to a 
>>> message on the DLQ, that means the journal can't be cleared, right?  The 
>>> only way to clear the journal is to delete the message from the DLQ first, 
>>> correct?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Barry Barnett
>>> WMQ Enterprise Services & Solutions
>>> Wells Fargo
>>> Cell: 704-564-5501
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Christian Posta [mailto:christian.po...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 6:13 PM
>>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Producer Flow Block - Consumer Deadlock after max memory
>>> limits exceeded
>>>
>>> Inline...
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM,  <barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>>>> Version: Active MQ v5.8
>>>> Embedded Broker, Producer, Consumer all within same JVM
>>>>
>>>> If max memory limits are set to 320MB, which equates to 10 journal files 
>>>> (32MB per file), the files cannot be cleared even if there is 1 message on 
>>>> the DLQ.
>>>
>>> So you might need to post your config (or show the code for your config if 
>>> embedded). "Memory Limits" set to 320MB isn't the same thing as "Store 
>>> Limits" set to 320MB with 32MB journal files. Individual files will be 
>>> cleared out if there are no useful artifacts in them (messages, durable 
>>> subscription info, producer audit data structures, etc...). The default 
>>> cleanup period is 30s:
>>>
>>> eg:
>>>
>>> <kahaDB cleanupInterval="30000" ..>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>This 1 message blocks the freeing up of the journal file where it resides.  
>>>>In order to resolve this, the JVM is >recycled.  I'm sure there is a better 
>>>>way of resolving this issue.  Any advice?
>>>
>>> Are producer/consumer using same connection? What ack mode is your consumer 
>>> using?
>>>
>>> Since this is embedded (broker,producer,consumer) it should be easy enough 
>>> to extract out the salient points and put together a unit test.
>>> If you provide something concrete like that, I can take a look and tell you 
>>> exactly what's happening.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Barry Barnett
>>>> WMQ Enterprise Services & Solutions
>>>> Wells Fargo
>>>> Cell: 704-564-5501
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Posta
>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Posta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> twitter: @christianposta



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Reply via email to