Yah, mvn clean install -Dtest=false will build everything.
Actually, i pulled out the test into my test sandbox here:

https://github.com/christian-posta/camel-sandbox/blob/master/activemq-5.8-issues/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/TwoBrokerReqeustReplyStompTempDestTest.java

You can clone the proj and build w/

$> mvn clean install -Dtest=false -DfailIfNoTests=false

Then navigate to the activemq-5.8-issues dir and can run test w/

$> mvn test
-Dtest=org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoBrokerReqeustReplyStompTempDestTest




On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:19 AM, someword <derek.ol...@jivesoftware.com>wrote:

> ceposta wrote
> > "i've gone ahead and put together the unit test here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/christian-posta/activemq/blob/someword-from-mailing-list/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/TwoBrokerReqeustReplyStompTempDestTest.java
> "
> >
> > ceposta
> > Thanks for putting the test together.   I've cloned the repo but i'm not
> > entirely clear on what to do.  I think I am supposed to 'build' the test
> > on one of our brokers.  Something like this
> > mvn install -Dtest=TwoBrokerReqeustReplyStompTempDestTest
> >
> > Then if that works I should adjust some of the test to try to get it to
> > fail.
> > Is that pretty accurate?
> >
> > Thanks. Derek.
> >
> >
> >
> > Do you have any links you could point me to which describe the process to
> > build this test?   I
> > It's a branch of the activemq code base, and the test is in there. I
> would
> > recommend running the test to see that it passes, then tweak it to get it
> > just right (like the environment you guys have) to get it to fail.
> >
> > I realize might be a lot going on there in the test, but if you and your
> > team can recreate the issue there, it would be much easier to solve :)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:01 PM, someword &lt;
>
> > derek.olsen@
>
> > &gt;wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Maybe you can post more about your clients?
> >> So your flow is Client -> Hub -> Spoke -> Server at which point the
> >> server
> >> responds to a temporary destination which flows messages Server -> Spoke
> >> ->
> >> Hub -> Client right?"
> >>
> >>
> >> That is correct.
> >>
> >> "How many messages does the server respond w/ over the temporary
> >> destination
> >> for each message the client sends in?"
> >>
> >> The server will respond with just one response to each message it gets.
> >> The server responds just fine for every single request it gets.
>  What's
> >> interesting is that during the course of about 1-2 seconds wall clock
> >> time
> >> 500 - 800 messages get to the server and responses get back to the
> >> reply-to
> >> queue before the blocking occurs.
> >>
> >>
> >> The underlying application we are using is called MCollective
> >> http://puppetlabs.com/mcollective.   I will post the code we are using
> >> which
> >> uses mcollective and stomp to recreate the problem to assist in
> >> troubleshooting.
> >>
> >> The code which runs on the server is here http://pastebin.com/7UgTpT32
> >> The code which runs on the client is here http://pastebin.com/kDYXYndv
> >>
> >> Please let me know what else I can provide.
> >> Thanks. Derek.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, someword &lt;derek.olsen@&gt;wrote:
> >>
> >> > I tried using 5.9 SNAPSHOT and get the same behavior.  Here is a link
> >> to
> >> a
> >> > thread dump from the broker where the blocking is occurring -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/ew0cL6Kd.  Additionally I've captured some
> >> strace/gdb
> >> > output of the ruby client in case that's helpful -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/FTKfczVd.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas?
> >> > Thanks.  Derek.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
> >>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671836.html
> >> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Christian Posta*
> >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> twitter: @christianposta
> >>
> >>
> >> Maybe you can post more about your clients?
> >> So your flow is Client -> Hub -> Spoke -> Server at which point the
> >> server
> >> responds to a temporary destination which flows messages Server -> Spoke
> >> ->
> >> Hub -> Client right?
> >>
> >> How many messages does the server respond w/ over the temporary
> >> destination
> >> for each message the client sends in?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, someword &lt;derek.olsen@&gt;wrote:
> >>
> >> > I tried using 5.9 SNAPSHOT and get the same behavior.  Here is a link
> >> to
> >> a
> >> > thread dump from the broker where the blocking is occurring -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/ew0cL6Kd.  Additionally I've captured some
> >> strace/gdb
> >> > output of the ruby client in case that's helpful -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/FTKfczVd.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas?
> >> > Thanks.  Derek.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
> >>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671836.html
> >> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Christian Posta*
> >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> twitter: @christianposta
> >>
> >>
> >> Maybe you can post more about your clients?
> >> So your flow is Client -> Hub -> Spoke -> Server at which point the
> >> server
> >> responds to a temporary destination which flows messages Server -> Spoke
> >> ->
> >> Hub -> Client right?
> >>
> >> How many messages does the server respond w/ over the temporary
> >> destination
> >> for each message the client sends in?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, someword &lt;derek.olsen@&gt;wrote:
> >>
> >> > I tried using 5.9 SNAPSHOT and get the same behavior.  Here is a link
> >> to
> >> a
> >> > thread dump from the broker where the blocking is occurring -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/ew0cL6Kd.  Additionally I've captured some
> >> strace/gdb
> >> > output of the ruby client in case that's helpful -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/FTKfczVd.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas?
> >> > Thanks.  Derek.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
> >>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671836.html
> >> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Christian Posta*
> >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> twitter: @christianposta
> >>
> >>
> >> Maybe you can post more about your clients?
> >> So your flow is Client -> Hub -> Spoke -> Server at which point the
> >> server
> >> responds to a temporary destination which flows messages Server -> Spoke
> >> ->
> >> Hub -> Client right?
> >>
> >> How many messages does the server respond w/ over the temporary
> >> destination
> >> for each message the client sends in?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, someword &lt;derek.olsen@&gt;wrote:
> >>
> >> > I tried using 5.9 SNAPSHOT and get the same behavior.  Here is a link
> >> to
> >> a
> >> > thread dump from the broker where the blocking is occurring -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/ew0cL6Kd.  Additionally I've captured some
> >> strace/gdb
> >> > output of the ruby client in case that's helpful -
> >> > http://pastebin.com/FTKfczVd.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas?
> >> > Thanks.  Derek.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
> >>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671836.html
> >> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Christian Posta*
> >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> twitter: @christianposta
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671839.html
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > twitter: @christianposta
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671862.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Reply via email to