Thanks for you reply My choice was a full mesh : A connects to B and C; B connects to A and C , ....
One question , do I need to set networkTTL to 2 ? or every message received by A is always resent to B & C ? Thanks 2013/9/12 Torsten Mielke <tmie...@redhat.com>: > The answers really depends on your use case and how you want to leverage the > brokers. > However the most typical topologies in general are a full mesh (every broker > connected to all other brokers) and hub-and-spoke (one hub broker and > multiple store brokers that connect to the hub). > > But again the best topology depends on your use case. > > Regards, > > Torsten Mielke > tmie...@redhat.com > tmielke.blogspot.com > > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:05 PM, Jose María Zaragoza wrote: > >> Hello: >> >> I'm using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 and my client requires to install 3 brokers >> into 3 different servers >> >> What is the best configuraration ? Each ActiveMQ server connected to >> others ? A ring ? >> Is possible a loop ? >> >> Thanks > > >
