Hi, I have set up ActiveMQ in a JDBC MasterSlave configuration. I have a use case where it would be useful to mark a broker as the "Master" broker which would always take a lock if it was owned by a slave. Is there anyway of doing this or something similar, e.g. some sort of order of precedence when brokers compete for the lock?
I would be able to achieve this perhaps by restarting the slaves when the "Master" is available but does not hold the lock, however it would be much cleaner if I could just configure a master broker which always takes the lock. Any help would be most appreciated. Thanks, Hayden. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Setting-a-Master-broker-in-a-MasterSlave-configuration-tp4668815.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
