It shouldn't. I gave it a try in the unit tests on trunk (changing line 86 and 87 to ">": http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/store/MessagePriorityTest.java?view=markup
What version are you using? On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Steve.V. <stephen.vinc...@sas.com> wrote: > Regarding the ">" destination > wildcard(http://activemq.apache.org/wildcards.html), I see an example in > http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html where is > shows the use of just ">" when setting a destination policy for all queues. > Specifically, the example shows: > > <policyEntry queue=">" prioritizedMessages="true"/> > > Some testing on a couple of Solaris platforms works when I specify the > actual queue specifically when setting prioritizedMessages to true. > However, it does not when simply specifying ">" in attempt to set > prioritizedMessages to true for all queues. > > Does the use of the ">"(recursively match any destination starting from > this > name) wildcard require at least one character preceding the greater-than > sign? > > > > ----- > Stephen Vincent > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Does-the-destination-wildcard-require-at-least-one-character-preceding-it-tp4662468.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
