Yah, you can specify different ACK modes and ack explicitly if you like.
Otherwise they are just auto-acked.

Check out Raul's great blog post on JMS Ack modes:
http://blog.raulkr.net/2012/08/consumer-acknowledgements-in-activemq.html


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Just one more question, is there a way to force acknowledgment of a message
> or send it to DLQ? I am wondering what safeguards we can put in place in
> active mq so that if and when this occurs it doesn't impact all other
> clients.
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Yes it's really helpful. Thanks again
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Christian Posta <
> christian.po...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Good call Claus. I've updated the wiki page here:
> >>
> >> http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-find-the-size-of-a-queue.html
> >>
> >> Should be a couple hours to propagate through.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Christian Posta
> >> > <christian.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Enqueue count = number of messages sent to the queue
> >> > > Dequeue count = number of messages ack'd by the consumer
> >> > > Inflight count = number of messages sent to consumer's session (and
> >> are
> >> > not
> >> > > ack'd by consumer)
> >> > > Dispatch count = messages sent to the consumer (dequeue + inflight)
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Nice summary. Christian I think you should add that as a FAQ
> >> > http://activemq.apache.org/faq
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > I asked about the async sends because the producer flow control you
> >> hit
> >> > was
> >> > > the kind that will block the entire connection (instead of just
> >> blocking
> >> > > that one producer).
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mohit Anchlia <
> >> mohitanch...@gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Thanks again! Is the dispatch queue size the one that relates to
> >> what's
> >> > >> held in memory?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> We are using mule and the endpoint has no transactions configured.
> >> What
> >> > did
> >> > >> you mean by forcing async?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Posta
> >> > >> <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Correct. The memoryUsage is increased when messages are held in
> >> > memory.
> >> > >> > This happens when messages are paged in from the store. They are
> >> then
> >> > >> > dispatched to consumers and held until the consumer acks.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > In your case looks like a particular destination (eventsEndpoint)
> >> is
> >> > >> > filling up somehow. Can you look in JMX and see how many
> enqueued,
> >> > >> > dispatched, dequeued, inflight etc? Also check to see how many
> >> > >> > subscriptions to that destination, and see what those
> >> dispatch-counter
> >> > >> and
> >> > >> > dispatch queue size looks like.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > BTW any chance you're sending (producers) using a transaction, or
> >> > forcing
> >> > >> > sends to be async?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Mohit Anchlia <
> >> > mohitanch...@gmail.com
> >> > >> > >wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > So if I understand correctly I shouldn't be seeing this
> behaviour
> >> > >> unless
> >> > >> > > something is being held in memory. We ack immediately so I am
> >> kind
> >> > of
> >> > >> > > wondering what might be going on here. Is there a way to find
> out
> >> > what
> >> > >> > > might be happening here?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Christian Posta
> >> > >> > > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > What info can you provide about how clients are consuming
> from
> >> the
> >> > >> > > queues?
> >> > >> > > > Any chance there are a bunch of messages "inflight" which
> >> haven't
> >> > >> been
> >> > >> > > > ack'd by the consumer?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mohit Anchlia <
> >> > >> mohitanch...@gmail.com
> >> > >> > > > >wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > I see these messages being logged. Queues are setup to use
> >> > >> persistent
> >> > >> > > > > store. I am wondering what's causing this messages to get
> >> > blocked.
> >> > >> I
> >> > >> > > see
> >> > >> > > > > there is a memoryLimit but if I am using persistent=true
> then
> >> > >> should
> >> > >> > > this
> >> > >> > > > > be the desired behaviour?
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > 2013-01-02 05:06:13,388 | INFO |
> >> > >> > > > > Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory)
> >> > >> percentUsage=0%,
> >> > >> > > > > usage=0, limit=20971520,
> >> > >> > > > > percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:memory)
> >> > >> > percentUsage=106%,
> >> > >> > > > > usage=22366029, limit=20971520, percentUsageMinDelta=1%:
> >> Usage
> >> > >> > Manager
> >> > >> > > > > Memory Limit reached. Producer
> >> > >> > > > > (ID:pfdamq301.ie.net-54582-1351809386355-2:1:1:1) stopped
> to
> >> > >> prevent
> >> > >> > > > > flooding queue://eventsEndpoint. See
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >    <broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
> >> > >> > > > > brokerName="static-broker1" persistent="true"
> >> > >> > > > > dataDirectory="${activemq.data}">
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >         <!-- Destination specific policies using
> destination
> >> > names
> >> > >> or
> >> > >> > > > > wildcards -->
> >> > >> > > > >         <destinationPolicy>
> >> > >> > > > >             <policyMap>
> >> > >> > > > >                 <policyEntries>
> >> > >> > > > >                     <policyEntry queue=">"
> >> > >> producerFlowControl="true"
> >> > >> > > > > memoryLimit="20mb">
> >> > >> > > > >                         <deadLetterStrategy>
> >> > >> > > > >                           <individualDeadLetterStrategy
> >> > >> > > > queuePrefix="DLQ."
> >> > >> > > > > useQueueForQueueMessages="true" />
> >> > >> > > > >                         </deadLetterStrategy>
> >> > >> > > > >                     </policyEntry>
> >> > >> > > > >                     <policyEntry topic=">"
> >> > >> producerFlowControl="true"
> >> > >> > > > > memoryLimit="20mb">
> >> > >> > > > >                     </policyEntry>
> >> > >> > > > >                 </policyEntries>
> >> > >> > > > >             </policyMap>
> >> > >> > > > >         </destinationPolicy>
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >         <!-- Use the following to configure how ActiveMQ is
> >> > exposed
> >> > >> > in
> >> > >> > > > JMX
> >> > >> > > > > -->
> >> > >> > > > >         <managementContext>
> >> > >> > > > >             <managementContext createConnector="true"/>
> >> > >> > > > >         </managementContext>
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > --
> >> > >> > > > *Christian Posta*
> >> > >> > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> > >> > > > twitter: @christianposta
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > *Christian Posta*
> >> > >> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> > >> > twitter: @christianposta
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > *Christian Posta*
> >> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> > > twitter: @christianposta
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Claus Ibsen
> >> > -----------------
> >> > Red Hat, Inc.
> >> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >> > Email: cib...@redhat.com
> >> > Web: http://fusesource.com
> >> > Twitter: davsclaus
> >> > Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> >> > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Christian Posta*
> >> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >> twitter: @christianposta
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Reply via email to