On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 17:51 +0000, Alona Rossen wrote: > Yes, it absolutely helps. The last question - does JMS-like means that it > follow JMS standard? >
The API attempts to adhere to the standard as much is possible, given there are language differences there are some places where things might work a bit differently or we may add some additional things that are nice to have which aren't part of the JMS API natively. A browse through the APIs in the CMS source should be helpful here. > -----Original Message----- > From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com] > Sent: July 24, 2012 1:45 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: RE: CMS - is it a Java wrapper? > > On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 16:21 +0000, Alona Rossen wrote: > > I will try to be more specific. > > > > There is a commercial product which enables C++ or .NET applications to use > > any Java Message Service specification v1.0.2 or v1.1 -compliant JMS > > provider. > > The functionality is based on generating C++ and .NET bindings for the JMS > > API and some assorted Java support types. Just to stress this fact: they > > generate bindings for Java types, they do not translate the Java types. > > This means that a JMS implementation is still required to perform the > > actual messaging, and the product simply provides an easy-to-use C++ and > > .NET gateway, both at development and run-time. > > > > My question is if CMS also requires JMS implementation to perform actual > > messaging or it targets ActiveMQ message broker independently of Java. > > > > Thank you, > > Alona > > ActiveMQ-CPP requires no Java bindings, its a standalone C++ library > that will work directly against ActiveMQ or it can communicate with a > broker that implements the STOMP protocol. There are a few required > libraries that it needs to build, and OpenSSL is optional if you want > SSL transport support. > > Hope that helps. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com] > > Sent: July 23, 2012 6:20 PM > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > Subject: RE: CMS - is it a Java wrapper? > > > > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 19:42 +0000, Alona Rossen wrote: > > > Does it mean that it targets JMS functionality of ActiveMQ? > > > > > > > Can you be a bit more specific? The CMS client exposes a JMS like API > > and has many of the same features as the ActiveMQ Java client such as > > failover, message compression, etc. > > > > > Thank you, > > > Alona > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: July-23-12 3:22 PM > > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: CMS - is it a Java wrapper? > > > > > > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 19:14 +0000, Alona Rossen wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Does CMS/ActiveMQ-CPP target JMS? Is this a C++ wrapper for JMS API? > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Alona > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CMS is a JMS like API for C++ it supports communication with ActiveMQ > > > via the native Openwire protocol or via Stomp messaging. > > > > > > -- Tim Bish Sr Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp tim.b...@fusesource.com | www.fusesource.com skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
