+1 from me as well. I'll reopen
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3823 and work on this. Also
will take this opportunity to get our php client up to date.

Regards
-- 
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
dej...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com
skype: dejan.bosanac | twitter: @dejanb
blog: http://www.nighttale.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> We can detect 1.0 clients and we should continue to trim the headers in 1.0
> case. That way we avoid break clients.
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So the root problem is the php client having space between the ':'
>> header key value separator that used to be trimmed.
>>
>> Seems like there is a need to make the 1.1 compliant behavior
>> introduced in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3823
>> configurable.
>> As in, have the option to force 1.0 (or existing amq) behavior when
>> the 1.1 version header is not present in a connect.
>> In fact, that seems like a sensible default.
>>
>>
>> On 23 July 2012 05:11, neek <n...@nickfenwick.com> wrote:
>> > I see that one of the changes going into ActiveMQ 5.6 was Stomp 1.1
>> support:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3449
>> >
>> > Could this have changed the Stomp protocol supported in ActiveMQ such
>> that
>> > my Stomp 1.0 PHP client can no longer communicate with it?  This sounds
>> like
>> > a regression, and so seems unlikely, however the specs at
>> > http://stomp.github.com/stomp-specification-1.0.html#STOMP_Frames and
>> > http://stomp.github.com/stomp-specification-1.1.html#STOMP_Framesclearly
>> > show a difference and ActiveMQ 5.6 seems to be breaking Stomp 1.0
>> > compatibility.
>> >
>> > This is supported by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3823which
>> > clearly states that no whitespace (ws) should be trimmed from headers.
>>  This
>> > makes an old Stomp 1.0 client completely incompatible with ActiveMQ and
>> its
>> > Stomp 1.1 implementation.  It seems there's no version handshaking going
>> on
>> > in the Stomp protocol, so old clients have no way of working against new
>> > servers because the server has no way of gracefully falling back to the
>> old
>> > protocol.
>> >
>> > I did a bunch of painful debugging that I'll omit here as the situation
>> > seems clear.
>> >
>> > Where should we get a PHP Stomp 1.1 client from?  I don't see one bundled
>> > with ActiveMQ and the usual suspects (
>> http://activemq.apache.org/php.html,
>> > http://stomp.fusesource.org/index.html,
>> > http://stomp.github.com/implementations.html) don't offer any fresh
>> leads.
>> > I see a comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3836 saying
>> > that the PHP client has been updated, but I don't see where to find this
>> > client.
>> >
>> > I'm falling back to ActiveMQ 5.5 for now.  A big red warning flag about
>> > breaking Stomp 1.0 compatibility would have been appreciated.  Perhaps
>> there
>> > was one and I missed it?
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/5-5-to-5-6-upgrade-stomp-client-suddenly-gets-User-name-xyz-or-password-is-invalid-tp4654229p4654230.html
>> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://fusesource.com
>> http://blog.garytully.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> **
>
> *Hiram Chirino*
>
> *Software Fellow | FuseSource Corp.*
>
> *chir...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com*
>
> *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> *
>
> *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
>
> *
> *
>
> *
> *

Reply via email to