have a peek at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1191
On 6 July 2012 16:36, mikmela <mikm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Have you seen this simple select *SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK WHERE ID=1* > working for MS SQL Server? > It doesn't for me in terms of master/slave synchronization (i.e. slave is > not blocked on this select) unless I do something like this *SELECT * FROM > ACTIVEMQ_LOCK(rowlock, updlock, REPEATABLEREAD) WHERE ID=1*... > > If anyone have successful implementation of MASTER/SLAVE configuration for > MS MSQL Server, please share details... > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-TransactDatabaseLocker-s-lock-statement-tp4653552p4653773.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://fusesource.com http://blog.garytully.com
