On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 17:33 +0200, Oscar Pernas wrote: > Hi all, > > Im trying to use ActiveMQ with IPV6 but Im running into some problems. I'm > in debian linux, and seems that ActiveMQ(5.5.1) is up and listening IPV6. > > tcp6 0 0 :::61616 :::* LISTEN 24671/java > > I can make a ping and a telnet to ::1 61616 and all seems that works fine. > > Now Im trying to connect two clients (one in Java and one in C++). > > -Java client: If I set the uri tcp://[::1]:61616, connection is stablished, > but if I add the failover transport (failover://(tcp://[::1]:61616)), I can > see an Invalid broker URI exception. Its not compatible, or there is > another way to use failover with IPV6?
Working up a unit test for this and creating an issue would be helpful, there are already some URI parsing tests in svn. > > - C++ Client: Im setting the same URI that it works in Java > (tcp://[::1]:61616) but doesnt work and I get "Resource temporarily > unavailable". Any idea of what coulde be reason? I tested too with a > connection string like this: ""tcp://[fe80::XXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX]:61616" and > I'm receiving this error "the requested name is valid and found in > database, but doesnt have the correct data that is trying to resolve". > > The C++ client doesn't have any support for IPV6 yet, we welcome any contributions you'd like to make in this area. > Any Idea? > > > thanks in advance > -- Tim Bish Sr Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp tim.b...@fusesource.com | www.fusesource.com skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
