All the servers and brokers are in their own private network, running in
LAN. So I would say it's a reliable network.
These errors come from the brokers deployed on site, but I also get the same
kind of errors sometimes in our testing plateform, now that I've checked.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 15:23, Torsten Mielke <tors...@fusesource.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Seeing this connection refused warning in your log file
>
> WARN  | Could not start network bridge between:
> vm://SRV-01?async=false&network=true and: tcp://SRV-02:31616 due to:
> java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused:
>
> I am wondering if the other end you're trying to connect to is up and
> running.
> Did the other end perhaps shut down?
> Do you operate on a reliable or shaky network?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Torsten Mielke
> tors...@fusesource.com
> tmie...@blogspot.com
>
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Sebastian Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm using ActiveMQ 5.4.0, in a network of broker configuration, with
> duplex
> > connections to send notifications in a server / clients architecture. I
> was
> > looking through the logs for an issue I had on site, and I noticed a lot
> of
> > warnings and errors related to connection between the members of the
> network
> > of brokers.
> > I've not been able to get enough information on what they mean and would
> > like to see if I can get some information?
> > The messages are as follow:
> >
> > ### start log ###
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:04,433 | WARN  | *Network connection between
> > vm://SRV-01#162 and tcp:///10.20.2.6:59104 shutdown due to a remote
> error:
> > java.io.EOFException* |
> org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge |
> > ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///10.20.2.6:59104
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:04,448 | INFO  | SRV-01 bridge to SRV-02 stopped |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge | ActiveMQ Task
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:24,729 | WARN  | *Network connection between
> vm://SRV-01#0
> > and tcp://SRV-02/10.20.2.6:31616 shutdown due to a remote error:
> > java.net.SocketException: Connection reset* |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge | ActiveMQ Transport:
> > tcp://SRV-02/10.20.2.6:31616
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:24,807 | INFO  | Establishing network connection from
> > vm://SRV-01?async=false&network=true to tcp://SRV-02:31616 |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DiscoveryNetworkConnector | Simple Discovery
> > Agent: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@3c0965
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:25,837 | INFO  | *Transport failed:
> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportDisposedIOException: Peer
> > (vm://SRV-01#347) disposed.* |
> > org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | Simple
> Discovery
> > Agent: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@3c0965
> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportDisposedIOException: Peer
> > (vm://SRV-01#347) disposed.
> > at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.vm.VMTransport.stop(VMTransport.java:159)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.vm.VMTransportServer$1.stop(VMTransportServer.java:81)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.stop(TransportFilter.java:65)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.stop(TransportFilter.java:65)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.stop(ResponseCorrelator.java:132)
> > at
> org.apache.activemq.util.ServiceSupport.dispose(ServiceSupport.java:43)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.network.DiscoveryNetworkConnector.onServiceAdd(DiscoveryNetworkConnector.java:137)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.discovery.simple.SimpleDiscoveryAgent$1.run(SimpleDiscoveryAgent.java:164)
> > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
> > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:25,837 | WARN  | Could not start network bridge between:
> > vm://SRV-01?async=false&network=true and: tcp://SRV-02:31616 due to:
> > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DiscoveryNetworkConnector | Simple Discovery
> > Agent: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@3c0965
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:25,837 | INFO  | Network connection between
> vm://SRV-01#346
> > and tcp://SRV-02:31616 shutdown due to a local error:
> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportDisposedIOException: Peer
> > (vm://SRV-01#346) disposed. |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge | ActiveMQ Task
> > ### end log###
> >
> > Then after several (fast) retries, the connection is established:
> >
> > ### start log ###
> > 2011-10-04 16:42:34,401 | INFO  | Network connection between
> vm://SRV-01#354
> > and tcp://SRV-02/10.20.2.6:31616(SRV-02) has been established. |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge | StartLocalBridge:
> > localBroker=vm://SRV-01#354
> > 2011-10-04 16:45:10,904 | INFO  | Transport failed:
> > java.net.SocketException: Connection reset |
> > org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | ActiveMQ
> > Transport: tcp:///10.20.2.12:52293
> > java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
> > at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpBufferedInputStream.fill(TcpBufferedInputStream.java:50)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport$2.fill(TcpTransport.java:575)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpBufferedInputStream.read(TcpBufferedInputStream.java:58)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport$2.read(TcpTransport.java:560)
> > at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:269)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readCommand(TcpTransport.java:226)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:218)
> > at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:201)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> > 2011-10-04 16:46:32,479 | INFO  | Transport failed:
> > java.net.SocketException:* Software caused connection abort: recv
> > failed |*org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport |
> > ActiveMQ
> > Transport: tcp:///10.20.2.13:55160
> > java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: recv failed
> > at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
> > at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpBufferedInputStream.fill(TcpBufferedInputStream.java:50)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport$2.fill(TcpTransport.java:575)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpBufferedInputStream.read(TcpBufferedInputStream.java:58)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport$2.read(TcpTransport.java:560)
> > at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:269)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readCommand(TcpTransport.java:226)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:218)
> > at
> > org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:201)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> > ### end log ###
> >
> > Then after a number of loops like this, the broker resets
> >
> > ### start log ###
> > 2011-10-04 17:23:54,256 | INFO  | ActiveMQ Message Broker (SRV-01,
> > ID:SRV-01-50868-1317764432687-0:0) is shutting down |
> > org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService | Thread-20
> > 2011-10-04 17:23:54,256 | INFO  | ActiveMQ Message Broker (SRV-01,
> > ID:SRV-01-50868-1317764432687-0:0) is shutting down |
> > org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService | ActiveMQ ShutdownHook
> > 2011-10-04 17:23:54,256 | INFO  | SRV-01 bridge to SRV-02 stopped |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge | Thread-20
> > 2011-10-04 17:23:54,256 | INFO  | Network Connector HA Queue Stopped |
> > org.apache.activemq.network.NetworkConnector | Thread-20
> > ### end log ###
> >
> > This happen relatively quite frequently (~30min) which is quite worrying.
> > Anyone experiencing the same problems? Or has a wild guess of what is
> > causing the error?
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Sebastien Rodriguez
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sebastien Rodriguez

Reply via email to