So deleting directly from DB is not an option? even when I stop the broker?

Regards,
Ngoc Hai




--- On Fri, 8/19/11, Hervé BARRAULT <herve.barra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Hervé BARRAULT <herve.barra...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Delete queues from JDBC storage
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Date: Friday, August 19, 2011, 6:39 PM
> Hi,
> For the purge mechanism i have found one simple
> modification, that you can
> try to apply to see if purge is faster (for my simple case
> i divided the
> duration by 5 but my table was small and the duration seems
> not linear with
> the number of messages).
> 
> It is quite simple : add an index based on the column used
> by activeMQ to
> (select/delete).
> 
> You can run the following SQL request to add an index :
>   CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ACTIVEMQ_MSGS_FULLIDX ON
> ACTIVEMQ_MSGS ("MSGID_PROD",
> "MSGID_SEQ", "CONTAINER");
> 
> Concerning the "patch", we have done some performance tests
> with activeMQ
> using JDBC persistence and Database admin suggests more
> modification than
> adding this index. (Some other tests are pending to try to
> well understand
> the behavior).
> 
> But, we will have to modify some part of the JDBC store and
> i'm not really
> sure that there will be no side effect.
> Some exchange with someone who knows the jdbc store code
> could be useful to
> avoid some regression in a proposed patch.
> 
> Or is there a documentation which explains clearly the
> mechanism ? When
> looking the code i've seen some coded herited from ActiveMQ
> 4.X which is no
> more used in ActiveMQ 5.X and it is a bit hard to
> understand all calls.
> 
> Regards
> Hervé
> 
> 
> 2011/8/19 Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
> 
> > Hervé, can you open a jira issue to track this and
> attach your changes
> > as a patch with an ASF grant.
> >
> > thanks.
> >
> > On 19 August 2011 09:02, Hervé BARRAULT <herve.barra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > As you notice this, i have written a post about
> the subject of the purge
> > > method in activemq which is really slow when
> using persistence (in my
> > case
> > > JDBC).
> > > I had proposed something but there was any
> response.
> > >
> > > 2011/8/19 Pham Ngoc Hai <pngoc...@yahoo.com>
> > >
> > >> I tried with JMX and it took a few hours to
> purge a queue with 50000
> > msgs.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- On Thu, 8/18/11, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > From: Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
> > >> > Subject: Re: Delete queues from JDBC
> storage
> > >> > To: users@activemq.apache.org
> > >> > Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 6:36
> PM
> > >> > Why don't you delete it using JMX or
> > >> > web console?
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards
> > >> > --
> > >> > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> > >> > -----------------
> > >> > The experts in open source integration
> and messaging -
> > >> http://fusesource.com
> > >> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > >> > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Pham
> Ngoc Hai <pngoc...@yahoo.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi, I'm using JDBC as storage, is
> it sufficient to
> > >> > delete a queue by
> > >> > > deleting it from the tables with
> > >> > > DELETE FROM activemq_msgs where
> > >> > container='queue://name'
> > >> > > DELETE FROM activemq_acks where
> > >> > container='queue://name'
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > Ngoc Hai
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://fusesource.com
> > http://blog.garytully.com
> >
>

Reply via email to