Same thing. Just different persistence adapters, KahaDB is the "preferred" one, it recovers much faster. http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
Hey Keith :) On Aug 5, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Keith Mann wrote: > We are developing our ActiveMQ architecture and we are hoping to understand > how we might evolve it as ActiveMQ continues to develop. Can anyone comment > on the status of KahaDB Master Slave, and/or on its benefits versus Shared > File System Master Slave? I've been unable to find much in the way of details > on the subject. > > Thanks in advance, > > Keith Mann > IT Architect (SOA) > 407 ETR
